|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Another LinkFrom: Terry J DuBose (tjdubose@juno.com)Sun Nov 21 12:34:55 2004
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ----__JNP_000_5d6a.0ba6.595a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Roberta, I hope I did not sound disparaging of OBGYN.net. I realize that y’all have struggled to keep OBGYN.net going, and have given us great latitude on editorial issues. You efforts are appreciated. Thanks for keeping on in inspite of the difficult times. Terry J. DuBose, MS, RDMS On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 01:36:53 -0500 Roberta Speyer <roberta.speyer@medispecialty.com> writes: Terry and Art, We will block that ad. The GOOGLE system doesn't give us a lot of leeway up front to select the individually ads just to bar pornography. But we can block certain ads once we see them. We still run the site. Just trying to cover the bills and trying this Google ad server. Roberta At 06:41 PM 11/20/2004, Terry J DuBose wrote: No, it is not appropriate use, IMHO. <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /> This from the advertisement. “Using our Standard fetal heart monitor, expecting parents can listen to their unborn baby's heartbeat as early as 10-12 weeks into their pregnancy. This Doctor quality baby doppler is reliable and easy to use.” The power fairly low, but there is the scenario where granddad buys one for his daughter, who has just found she is pregnant. She could spend hours insonating a 4-14 week gestation before she ever locates the heart beat. We don’t have any idea what that much high frequency Doppler energy will do in the 1st trimester. This was taken to the AIUM Bioeffects Committee some time ago, and the FDA representative said that their budget had been cut and they had real problems with dangerous questions about medications, especially some cardiac drugs and sonography just wasn’t on their radar. It is unfortunate that it seems primarily doctors who are pushing these non-medical uses. It also appears that OBGYN.net has sold some banner space to other organizations (GOOGLE.com?) that does not screen the content from a medical professional’s point of view… bottom dollar medicine is here. Let’s ask them to block these again, but I have no idea who is actually in control of the main OBGYN.net site now. Terry
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 16:11:51 -0600 evsono@pipeline.com (art fougner, md)
writes:
> Terry Roberta Speyer, President OBGYN.net CEO, MediSpecialty Inc. 1 Richmond Street, Suite 4002 New Brunswick, NJ USA 08901 Email: roberta.speyer@medispecialty.com Office: (732) 828-6382 Fax: (732) 828-6385 Mobile: (512) 415-6180 Portfolio Performers: http://www.obgyn.net http://www.endozone.org http://www.oblink.com http://www.firstvisit.org http://www.gonadotropin.org http://www.agingmale2004.com http://www.firstvisitivf.com http://www.ivstunneller.com ----__JNP_000_5d6a.0ba6.595a Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> Roberta, I hope I did not sound disparaging of OBGYN.net. I realize that y’all have struggled to keep OBGYN.net going, and have given us great latitude on editorial issues. You efforts are appreciated. Thanks for keeping on in inspite of the difficult times.
Terry J. DuBose, MS, RDMS On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 01:36:53 -0500 Roberta Speyer <roberta.speyer@medispecialty.com>
writes:
----__JNP_000_5d6a.0ba6.595a-- Look for special offers at Best Buy stores.
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:36:19 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.