-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Informal Case: Nuchal Translucency versus Cystic Hygroma From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com) Tue Nov 2 07:58:43 2004 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: DR. JOE ANTONY: "sonography from me" Previous message: Terry J DuBose: "Re: sonography from me" In reply to: Johanna: "Re: Informal Case: Nuchal Translucency versus Cystic Hygroma" 80% of cases with NT between 4.5 - 6.4 mm result in HEALTHY Liveborn Infants. Souka et al. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 1998;11: 391-400. art At Mon, 1 Nov 2004, Johanna wrote: > >We had a similar case where the nuchal was 6.4mm. The baby was born at term >having no signs of any abnormality. Don't these anatenatal findings just >cause unnecessary anxiety to the parents and professionals involved? >Johanna. UK -- art fougner, md ich bin ein New Yorker Next message: DR. JOE ANTONY: "sonography from me" Previous message: Terry J DuBose: "Re: sonography from me" In reply to: Johanna: "Re: Informal Case: Nuchal Translucency versus Cystic Hygroma"

recommended search...
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:36:19 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.