Re: fetal echogenic bowel

From: DuBose, Terry (DuboseTerryJ@uams.edu)
Wed Aug 4 10:12:58 2004


In addition to the good information given by Philippe Jeanty, consider that the higher frequencies of modern sonography may make normal bowel appear more echogenic. If you are in the 5 Mega Hertz or so range, you might try a 2-3 MHz transducer and see if the bowel appears more normal. For more on this see:

http://www.jultrasoundmed.org/cgi/content/full/21/3/351

(c) 2002 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine <http://www.jultrasoundmed.org/misc/terms.shtml> J Ultrasound Med 21:351-354 * 0278-4297

________________________________

Case Report

--
________________________________

Prenatal Detection of Echogenic Bowel in a Fetus With Familial Microvillous Atrophy

Mark Levental, MD, Dolores H. Pretorius, MD, Angela L. Scioscia, MD, Khaldon Jundi, MD, Donna Wallace, MD and Nancy E. Budorick, MD

"The magnitude of the echogenicity of the bowel seems to play a predictive role: bowel that is equal to or more echogenic than bone (usually adjacent pelvic bone) has a greater association with abnormal outcome.1,2 It is important to note that the sonographic technique affects our ability to identify echogenic bowel. Highfrequency (>5-MHz) transducers and tissue harmonics can make normal bowel appear echogenic.12"

Also see: http://bidmc.harvard.edu/display.asp?leaf_id=3432

And the references given at the bottom of that web page.

Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS, FSDMS, FAIUM

Associate Professor & Director

Diagnostic Medical Sonography Program

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, CHRP

4301 West Markham St. Mail Slot #563

Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205 USA

501-686-6510

DuBoseTerryJ@UAMS.edu

http://www.io.com/~dubose/

http://www.uams.edu/chrp/dms/default.asp

http://www.obgyn.net/us/panel/panel.htm

---------------------------------------------------------------

=20 ---------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------

-----Original Message----- From: ultrasound@obgyn.net [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Philippe Jeanty, MD, PhD Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 9:58 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND Subject: Re: fetal echogenic bowel

Nothing... just a normal variant. Probably a small placental hemorrhage with

swallowed and undigested blood. I would reassure the parents

-----Original Message-----

From: ultrasound@obgyn.net [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of

Yiannis Nickolidakis

Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 9:34 AM

To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND

Subject: fetal echogenic bowel

An ultrasound scan during 18th week of a 29 years old healthy

primigravida revealed certain fetal echogenic bowel.

No other abnormalities were seen.

She had no vaginal bleeding since now.

Nuchal translucency on 12th week was <2mm.

Triplo test shows 1:10.000 risk for Down syndrome.

Serologic tests for congenital infections are negative.

The pregnant is not carrier of a known mutation of cystic fibrosis gene.

She is not positive to do an amniocentesis for fetal karyotyping.

If this embryo has no Down syndrome, not cystic fibrosis, not congenital

infection, what else could it has?

Dr. Yiannis Nickolidakis

Greece

http://www.medpages.obgyn.net/geneticsunit.gr

------------------------------------

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, = ------------------------------------ is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain =

--
------------------------------------
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.



recommended search...
Google
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

use when must restrict search to only the ultrasound forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  Ultrasound Forum Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:36:14 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.