Re: Ultrasound Infertiltiy Evaluation

From: linda dipiazza (lindad1@netnitco.net)
Wed May 12 06:55:16 2004


Didi Danukusumo

I would very much like a copy of the article that is being discussed here-please let me know how to obtain one for my files .

Thank you;

LindaD

>----- Original Message -----
From: dididanu@cbn.net.id To: "Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND" <ultrasound@dns.obgyn.net> Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 5:05 AM Subject: Re: Ultrasound Infertiltiy Evaluation

> a copy of pdf for me also
>
> Didi Danukusumo
>
> ULTRASOUND Digest 2213
> >
> > Topics covered in this issue include:
> >
> > 1) RE: Ultrasound Infertiltiy Evaluation
> > by "hasmukh lal" <doctorhasmukh@hotmail.com>
> > 2) Re: Ultrasound Infertiltiy Evaluation
> > by LDPLATT@aol.com
> > 3) RE: Ultrasound Infertiltiy Evaluation
> > by "Rob Taggart Jr." <robtrdms@peoplepc.com>
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 08:26:59 +0530
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > From: "hasmukh lal" <doctorhasmukh@hotmail.com>
> > To: ultrasound@obgyn.net
> > Subject: RE: Ultrasound Infertiltiy Evaluation
> > Message-ID: <BAY8-F118IPDrGsWt3o000129ff@hotmail.com>
> > Mime-Version: 1.0
> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
> >
> > a copy of pdf for me also
> > hasmukh
> >
> >>From: evsono@pipeline.com (art fougner, md)
> >>Reply-To: ultrasound@obgyn.net
> >>To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND <ultrasound@dns.obgyn.net>
> >>Subject: Ultrasound Infertiltiy Evaluation
> >>Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 08:29:17 -0500
> >>
> >>Nice Review
> >>
> >>2004 MAY 6 - (NewsRx.com & NewsRx.net) -- Less invasive tools offer
> >>timelier assessments of infertility problems.
> >>
> >>According to a study from Sweden, "an optimal initial infertility
> >>investigation protocol would be a process that is diagnostically
> >>accurate, expeditious, cost-effective, reliable and as minimally
> >>invasive as possible. In addition, the investigation should provide the
> >>clinician with useful prognostic information regarding possible future
> >>treatment. At present, extensive use of invasive procedures such as
> >>diagnostic hysteroscopy and laparoscopy is the standard at many
> >>fertility centers.
> >>
> >>"Recent advances in gynecological ultrasonography have shown that
> >>ultrasound can replace routine invasive investigative procedures. An
> >>ultrasound-based approach would make the basic infertility investigation
> >>less time-consuming and less expensive, but at the same time more
> >>acceptable to the majority of patients," according to E. Ekerhovd and
> >>colleagues, Karolinska Hospital, Reproductive Medical Center.
> >>
> >>"This chapter describes an ultrasound-based approach to the assessment
> >>of infertility. In addition, the role of ultrasonography for assessment
> >>of the pelvic organs as a basic part of the initial investigation of an
> >>infertile couple is discussed and compared to more traditional invasive
> >>methods," study authors said.
> >>
> >>Ekerhovd and colleagues published their study in Best Practice &
> >>Research in Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology (An ultrasound-based
> >>approach to the assessment of infertility, including the evaluation of
> >>tubal patency. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gy, 2004;18(1):13-28).
> >>
> >>For more information, contact S. Granberg, Karolinska Hospital,
> >>Reproductive Med Center, Department Woman & Child Hlth, Division
> >>Obstetrics & Gynecology, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden.
> >>
> >>Publisher contact information for the journal Best Practice & Research
> >>in Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology is: Bailliere Tindall, 24-28 Oval
> >>Rd., London NW1 7DX, England.
> >>
> >>The information in this article comes under the major subject areas of
> >>Diagnostic Imaging, Obstetrics, and Reproductive Medicine. This article
> >>was prepared by Women's Health Weekly editors from staff and other
> >>reports. Copyright 2004, Women's Health Weekly via NewsRx.com &
> >>NewsRx.net.
> >>
> >>art
> >>
> >>PS - anyone who wants a pdf of the cited article pls let me know. ( yet
> >>another shameless ploy to get more activity here)
> >>
> >>--
> >>art fougner, md
> >>ich bin ein New Yorker
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Let your desktop sizzle! Get the hottest wallpapers.
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > http://www.msn.co.in/entertainment/ Right here at MSN Entertainment!
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > ------------------------------
> > Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 00:09:22 EDT
> > ------------------------------
> > From: LDPLATT@aol.com
> > To: ultrasound@obgyn.net
> > Subject: Re: Ultrasound Infertiltiy Evaluation
> > Message-ID: <ea.4df85dfd.2dd1abf2@aol.com>
> > MIME-Version: 1.0
> > Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> > boundary="-----------------------------1084248562"
> >
> > -------------------------------1084248562
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> >
> > A PDF File would be great to have....Lplatt
> >
> > -------------------------------1084248562
> > Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> >
> > <HTML><HEAD>
> > <META charset=US-ASCII http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html;
> > cha> > rset=US-ASCII">
> > <META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
> > <BODY style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; BACKGROUND-COLOR:
> > #fffff> > f">A PDF File would be great to have....Lplatt</BODY></HTML>
> >
> > -------------------------------1084248562--
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > ------------------------------
> > Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 07:59:32 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
> > ------------------------------
> > From: "Rob Taggart Jr." <robtrdms@peoplepc.com>
> > To: ultrasound@obgyn.net
> > Subject: RE: Ultrasound Infertiltiy Evaluation
> > Message-ID:> > <26709763.1084280373311.JavaMail.root@wamui03.slb.atl.earthlink.net>
> > Mime-Version: 1.0
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> >
> > I would welcome a copy also. Thanks
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: hasmukh lal <doctorhasmukh@hotmail.com>
> > Sent: May 10, 2004 9:59 PM
> > To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND <ultrasound@dns.obgyn.net>
> > Subject: RE: Ultrasound Infertiltiy Evaluation
> >
> > a copy of pdf for me also
> > hasmukh
> >
> >>From: evsono@pipeline.com (art fougner, md)
> >>Reply-To: ultrasound@obgyn.net
> >>To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND <ultrasound@dns.obgyn.net>
> >>Subject: Ultrasound Infertiltiy Evaluation
> >>Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 08:29:17 -0500
> >>
> >>Nice Review
> >>
> >>2004 MAY 6 - (NewsRx.com & NewsRx.net) -- Less invasive tools offer
> >>timelier assessments of infertility problems.
> >>
> >>According to a study from Sweden, "an optimal initial infertility
> >>investigation protocol would be a process that is diagnostically
> >>accurate, expeditious, cost-effective, reliable and as minimally
> >>invasive as possible. In addition, the investigation should provide the
> >>clinician with useful prognostic information regarding possible future
> >>treatment. At present, extensive use of invasive procedures such as
> >>diagnostic hysteroscopy and laparoscopy is the standard at many
> >>fertility centers.
> >>
> >>"Recent advances in gynecological ultrasonography have shown that
> >>ultrasound can replace routine invasive investigative procedures. An
> >>ultrasound-based approach would make the basic infertility investigation
> >>less time-consuming and less expensive, but at the same time more
> >>acceptable to the majority of patients," according to E. Ekerhovd and
> >>colleagues, Karolinska Hospital, Reproductive Medical Center.
> >>
> >>"This chapter describes an ultrasound-based approach to the assessment
> >>of infertility. In addition, the role of ultrasonography for assessment
> >>of the pelvic organs as a basic part of the initial investigation of an
> >>infertile couple is discussed and compared to more traditional invasive
> >>methods," study authors said.
> >>
> >>Ekerhovd and colleagues published their study in Best Practice &
> >>Research in Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology (An ultrasound-based
> >>approach to the assessment of infertility, including the evaluation of
> >>tubal patency. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gy, 2004;18(1):13-28).
> >>
> >>For more information, contact S. Granberg, Karolinska Hospital,
> >>Reproductive Med Center, Department Woman & Child Hlth, Division
> >>Obstetrics & Gynecology, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden.
> >>
> >>Publisher contact information for the journal Best Practice & Research
> >>in Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology is: Bailliere Tindall, 24-28 Oval
> >>Rd., London NW1 7DX, England.
> >>
> >>The information in this article comes under the major subject areas of
> >>Diagnostic Imaging, Obstetrics, and Reproductive Medicine. This article
> >>was prepared by Women's Health Weekly editors from staff and other
> >>reports. Copyright 2004, Women's Health Weekly via NewsRx.com &
> >>NewsRx.net.
> >>
> >>art
> >>
> >>PS - anyone who wants a pdf of the cited article pls let me know. ( yet
> >>another shameless ploy to get more activity here)
> >>
> >>--
> >>art fougner, md
> >>ich bin ein New Yorker
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Let your desktop sizzle! Get the hottest wallpapers.
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > http://www.msn.co.in/entertainment/ Right here at MSN Entertainment!
> >
> > PeoplePC Online
> > A better way to Internet
> > http://www.peoplepc.com
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > ------------------------------
> > End of ULTRASOUND Digest 2213
> > ------------------------------
> > *****************************
> >




recommended search...
Google
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

use when must restrict search to only the ultrasound forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  Ultrasound Forum Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 05:19:36 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.