Re: risk recalculation

From: =?utf-8?B?zpTPgS4gzpnPic6szr3Ovc63z4Igzp3Ouc66zr/Ou865zrTOrM66zrfPgg==?= (nickolidakis@geneticsunit.gr)
Thu Jan 15 13:12:14 2004


where in your website is the file you mention below that I can download it? Y.Nickolidakis Athens, Greece.

>----- Original Message -----
From: "David Nyberg" <nyberg@u.washington.edu> To: "Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND" <ultrasound@dns.obgyn.net> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 5:58 PM Subject: Re: risk recalculation

> There is good evidence that biochemical markers and ultrasound markers are
independent. Also, most ultrasound markers are indpendent of one another. We have previously reported likelihood ratios for ultrasound markers as isolated findings, assuming that you also perform a systematic "genetic sonogram" in the same or similar manner, and the finding really is isolated (ie don't forget humerus length shortening). We showed that isolated EIF carries a Likelihood ratio of 1.8, or estimate as 2. This does not apply to asian populations however, because of the high prevalence of EIF among asian. Although a right sided EIF is considerably more unusual than a left sided one- and I'd be sure you are not identifying the moderator band rather than an EIF- I would not change the likelihood ratio based on this alone. On the other hand, bilateral EIFs definitely seem to carry a higher risk- we just don't know how to quantify that risk yet. > So in this case, with the caveats mentioned, the risk should be no more
than about 1:300 (606/2) and in fact a little lower than that if you use a LR of 1.8. In other words, the patient remains in the "low risk" category despite the finding based on the normal first trimester screen. You can still download or see an excel file that quantifies this at an educational website, http://www.fetalcenter. org >
> hope this helps
>
> David
>
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Patrizia wrote:
>
> > dear colleagues
> >
> > having an ultrascreening risk of 1:606 at 12 th week of gestation
> > the finding of a golf ball in the right ventricle at 20 th week of
> > gestation, how modify the risk for down syndrome?
> >
> > thank you for support
> >
> > dr patrizia
> >
>
> David Nyberg, MD
> 10401 E McDowell Mtn Ranch Rd
> #2-372
> Scottsdale, AZ 85255
> ph cell 480-797-0993
> fax 480-512-8737
> work 480-512-3850
>




recommended search...
Google
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

use when must restrict search to only the ultrasound forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  Ultrasound Forum Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:36:00 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.