-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Soft markers for genetic problems From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com) Mon Oct 13 18:58:45 2003 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Terry J DuBose: "Re: Soft markers for genetic problems" Previous message: Terry J. DuBose: "Re: Soft markers for genetic problems" Terry Kypros Nicolaides has a good review on the subject of aneuploidy detection in the "White Journal" - Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol 21 Issue 4 pp 313 - 321. I think this may be what you need. Today i'm off celebrating Columbus' First Cruise to the Bahamas. Cheers! art At Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Terry J. DuBose wrote: > >Good info. thanks very much. Terry > >ultrasound@obgyn.net writes: >>It's better to use Likelihood ratio than PPV or NPV to eliminate the problem >>of the prevalence.++++ >> >>The Bayes's Theorem is the best tool. >> >>The best LR is nucal translucency in 1 st trimester and nasal bones and >>nuchal fold in the second trimester. >> >>But it seems that soft markers have a little signification after the main >>filter of 12 wa nucal translucency measurement. >> >>Ph coquel > >-- >Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS, FSDMS, FAIUM >Assistant Professor & Director, Diagnostic Medical Sonography Program >University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, CHRP >4301 West Markham St. Mail Slot #563 >Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205 USA >501-686-6510 >DuBoseTerryJ@UAMS.edu >http://www.io.com/~dubose/ >http://www.uams.edu/chrp/dms/default.asp >http://www.obgyn.net/us/panel/panel.htm > -- art fougner, md ich bin ein New Yorker Next message: Terry J DuBose: "Re: Soft markers for genetic problems" Previous message: Terry J. DuBose: "Re: Soft markers for genetic problems"

recommended search...
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 05:19:23 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.