Re: Unilateral, large, hyperechoic kidney
From: Terry J DuBose (tjdubose@juno.com)
Wed Apr 23 18:01:27 2003
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
----__JNP_000_262d.5292.2265
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-9
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Dear Recep Has,
Yes, thanks for the English... any language is fine, but an English
version helps on this list.
I remember you initial case of unilateral infantyl type of policystic
kidney (it was homogenously hyperechoic), but not that anyone here had
seen it before. The case is here:
http://www.obgyn.net/us/us.asp?page=/us/present/0302/has_kidney
And now you have another case in a hospital near by? Interesting. I
guess there was no pathology on your case, correct?
Please keep us informed.
Thanks, Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS
Little Rock, Arkansas USA
--------------------------------------------
On Wed, 23 Apr 2003 17:30:35 -0500 <recephas@superonline.com> writes:
--------------------------------------------
>
--
--------------------------------------------
>
> Sefa merhaba,
>
> Burada karşılaşmak çok güzel, ama bizim olgu benim mesajımdan
> bir-iki hafta
> sonra terminasyonu istedi, gebelik sonlandırıldı, şu anda patolo ji
> raporunu
> bekliyoruz...
>
> Görüşmek üzere...
>
> Recep Has
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> Sorry for not discussing in English,
> However a similar case has been diagnosed at a neighbouring
> hospital, and we
> are trying to identfy if that one was the same case or not...
>
> Dr. Recep Has
>
> > Kimden: sefa051@hotmail.com (sefa kelekci)
> > Tarih: 2003/04/23 Wed PM 10:27:52 GMT+02:00
> > Kime: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND
> <ultrasound@mail.medispecialty.
> com>
> > Konu: Re: Unilateral, large, hyperechoic kidney
> >
> > At Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Recep Has wrote:
> > >
> > >I have detected a large (36x18mm), hyperechoic kidney in a 24
> week
> > >fetus. The appearence of the kidney was similar to infantyl type
> of
> > >policystic kidney (it was homogenously hyperechoic, there was no
> tumor
> > >(ie. nephroblastoma, or congenital mesoblastic nephroma) or
> cystic
> > >structures in the parenchym, and the pelvis renalis visible but
> not full
> > >with urine).
> > >However, the other kidney was normal in size (31x18mm) and
> appearence.
> > >Both adrenal glands were normal in size, localization and
> appearence.
> > >Amniotic fluid volume was normal and the largest diameter of the
> bladder
> > >was 17mm. Fetus had no additional abnormality.
> > >
> > >I looked for if ARPKD (infantyl polycystic disease) could be
> > >unilateral(at least in this stage of the pregnancy), but found no
> > >information.
> > >
> > >(I will try to upload the images)
> > >
> > >Is there any comment on this?
> > >
> > >--
> > >Recep Has
> > >University of Istanbul, Faculty of Medicine
> > >Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
> > >Prenatal Diagnosis Unit
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Recep hocam
> > nerelerde karşılaşıyoruz değerli hocam
> > Ben süleymaniye den Dr sefa
> > sanırım o vaka bize geldi açıkcası bizde aynı kuşkuları taşıyoruz
> ailenin de
> istegi üzerine vakayı takip ediyoruz şu anda 21 haftalık yine ASV
> normal
> mesaneyi izleyemedik ama asit gelişti
> > yinede aile takip edilmesini istedi. Eğer aynı vaka ise ailenin 2
> tane IPCKD
> li infant öyküsü var.
> > Selamlar
> > saygılar
> > sefa kelekci
> > 0 532 408 28 78
> >
>
Dear Recep Has, we have your images and they are being formatted for the
Editorial Advisory Board's review.
Thanks, Terry J DuBose, M.S., RDMS
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 20:40:28 -0600 recephas@superonline.com (Recep Has)
writes:
I have detected a large (36x18mm), hyperechoic kidney in a 24 week fetus.
The appearence of the kidney was similar to infantyl type of policystic
kidney (it was homogenously hyperechoic, there was no tumor (ie.
nephroblastoma, or congenital mesoblastic nephroma) or cystic structures
in the parenchym, and the pelvis renalis visible but not full with
urine).
However, the other kidney was normal in size (31x18mm) and appearence.
Both adrenal glands were normal in size, localization and appearence.
Amniotic fluid volume was normal and the largest diameter of the bladder
was 17mm. Fetus had no additional abnormality.
I looked for if ARPKD (infantyl polycystic disease) could be
unilateral(at least in this stage of the pregnancy), but found no
information.
(I will try to upload the images)
----__JNP_000_262d.5292.2265
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-9
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
Dear Recep Has,
Yes, thanks for the English... any language is fine, but an English version
helps on this list.
And now you have another case in a hospital near by?
Interesting. I guess there was no pathology on your case,
correct?
Please keep us informed.
Thanks, Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS
Little Rock, Arkansas USA
--------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
On Wed, 23 Apr 2003 17:30:35 -0500 <
--------------------------------------------
>
>
> Sefa merhaba,
>
>
Burada karþýlaþmak çok güzel, ama bizim olgu benim mesajýmdan
> bir-iki
hafta
> sonra terminasyonu istedi, gebelik sonlandýrýldý, þu anda patolo
ji
> raporunu
> bekliyoruz...
>
> Görüþmek üzere...
>
> Recep Has
>
>
>
>
> Dear
Colleagues,
>
> Sorry for not discussing in English,
>
However a similar case has been diagnosed at a neighbouring
> hospital,
and we
> are trying to identfy if that one was the same case or
not...
>
> Dr. Recep Has
>
>
>
> >
Kimden: sefa051@hotmail.com (sefa
kelekci)
> > Tarih: 2003/04/23 Wed PM 10:27:52 GMT+02:00
> >
Kime: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND
> <ultrasound@mail.medispecialty.
>
com>
> > Konu: Re: Unilateral, large, hyperechoic kidney
>
>
> > At Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Recep Has wrote:
> >
>
> > >I have detected a large (36x18mm), hyperechoic kidney in a
24
> week
> > >fetus. The appearence of the kidney was
similar to infantyl type
> of
> > >policystic kidney (it was
homogenously hyperechoic, there was no
> tumor
> >
>(ie. nephroblastoma, or congenital mesoblastic nephroma) or
>
cystic
> > >structures in the parenchym, and the pelvis renalis
visible but
> not full
> > >with urine).
> >
>However, the other kidney was normal in size (31x18mm) and
>
appearence.
> > >Both adrenal glands were normal in size,
localization and
> appearence.
> > >Amniotic fluid volume was
normal and the largest diameter of the
> bladder
> > >was
17mm. Fetus had no additional abnormality.
> > >
> >
>I looked for if ARPKD (infantyl polycystic disease) could be
> >
>unilateral(at least in this stage of the pregnancy), but found no
>
> >information.
> > >
> > >(I will try to upload
the images)
> > >
> > >Is there any comment on
this?
> > >
> > >--
> > >Recep Has
>
> >University of Istanbul, Faculty of Medicine
> > >Department
of Obstetrics and Gynecology
> > >Prenatal Diagnosis Unit
>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Recep hocam
> >
nerelerde karþýlaþýyoruz deðerli hocam
> > Ben süleymaniye den Dr
sefa
> > sanýrým o vaka bize geldi açýkcasý bizde ayný kuþkularý
taþýyoruz
> ailenin de
> istegi üzerine vakayý takip ediyoruz þu
anda 21 haftalýk yine ASV
> normal
> mesaneyi izleyemedik ama asit
geliþti
> > yinede aile takip edilmesini istedi. Eðer ayný vaka ise
ailenin 2
> tane IPCKD
> li infant öyküsü var.
> >
Selamlar
> > saygýlar
> > sefa kelekci
> > 0 532 408
28 78
> >
>
>
>
Dear Recep Has, we have your images and they are being formatted for the
Editorial Advisory Board's review.
Thanks, Terry J DuBose, M.S., RDMS
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 20:40:28 -0600 recephas@superonline.com
(Recep Has) writes:
I have detected a large (36x18mm), hyperechoic kidney in a 24 week fetus. The
appearence of the kidney was similar to infantyl type of policystic kidney (it
was homogenously hyperechoic, there was no tumor (ie. nephroblastoma, or
congenital mesoblastic nephroma) or cystic structures in the parenchym, and the
pelvis renalis visible but not full with urine).
However, the other kidney was normal in size (31x18mm) and appearence. Both
adrenal glands were normal in size, localization and appearence. Amniotic fluid
volume was normal and the largest diameter of the bladder was 17mm. Fetus had no
additional abnormality.
I looked for if ARPKD (infantyl polycystic disease) could be unilateral(at
least in this stage of the pregnancy), but found no information.
(I will try to upload the images)
----__JNP_000_262d.5292.2265--
