|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Two Yolk Sacs, one embryoFrom: Terry J. DuBose (duboseterryj@uams.edu)Thu Jan 30 16:14:12 2003
We have revised Dr. Libardi's case of early twins... he has provided follow-up today. We have removed the "double bleb" information, which was clearly not applicable in this case. >http://www.obgyn.net/us/us.asp?page=/us/present/0301/libardi_oneembryo Using Dr. Libardi's measurements in BASIC BABY software to estimate ages, I got the following: Larger embryo: CRL = 8.7 mm = 6.9 weeks EHR = 139 b/m = 6.8 weeks Smaller embryo: CRL = 7.7 mm = 6.7 weeks EHR = 129 b/m = 6.4 weeks Based upon the CRL age of 5w5d on Jan. 21, 2003, an age of about 6.9 weeks would be expected today. The report of one irregular sac is worrisome, but based on the measurements, these look very much like normal, yet slightly discordant twins. The 12 week follow-up will be anxiously awaited. Thanks for a great case from which all of us can learn. Peace, Terry J DuBose
Susan.Dale@obgyn.net writes:
> Case has been updated with his comments and one new image. Please let me know if this is what we want:[ http://www.obgyn.net/us/us.asp?page=/us/present/0301/libardi_oneembryo ]http://www.obgyn.net/us/us.asp?page=/us/present/0301/libardi_oneembryo Peace, Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS Assistant Professor & Director, Diagnostic Medical Sonography Program University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, CHRP 4301 West Markham St. Mail Slot #563 Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205 USA 501-686-6510 DuBoseTerryJ@UAMS.edu http://www.io.com/~dubose/ http://www.uams.edu/CHRP/dmshome.htm http://www.obgyn.net/us/panel/panel.htm
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:35:41 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.