ULTRASOUND Messages for November, 2002: Re: mail server problem

This seems an interesting paper

I am surprised that the sign is a « new » sign because it is used in France since twelve years.

Two years ago, we spoke about it in this forum (with images) and with Ph Jeanty

But B Benacerraf and B Bromley show a statistically significant difference between the groups (Down syndrome and normal euploid fetuses. And calculate the likelihood ratio

The limit is the significance of the nasal bone as an isolated finding, in a low-risk population,

Ph Coquel,MD

New sonographic marker detects Down syndrome
11/19/02
By: Tracie L. Thompson

A short or absent nasal bone as noted on second-trimester ultrasound may
indicate a fetus with Down syndrome, according to a new study.

Dr. Beryl Benacerraf, clinical professor of radiology and obstetrics and
gynecology at Harvard Medical School, presented initial findings from her
group's research at the 2002 Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound meeting
in San Francisco. The study will be published in the December issue of the
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine; the first co-author is Dr. Bryann
Bromley, an associate clinical professor of obstetrics, gynecology and
reproductive biology, also at Harvard Medical School in Boston.

A number of obstetrical ultrasound findings have been previously identified
in the medical literature as frequent but nondefinitive markers of Down
syndrome in the second trimester. These include nuchal translucency
indicating redundant skin at the back of the neck, hyperechoic bowel, short
femur and humerus bones, and others.

Researchers have only recently focused on nasal bone length as a possible
sonographic marker, even though Dr. J. Langdon Down in 1866 described a
characteristically small nose as part of the syndrome. In 2001, British
researchers looking at first-trimester sonograms reported that a short or
missing nasal bone identified 73% of Down syndrome fetuses with a 1%
false-positive rate (The Lancet, November 17, 2001, Vol.358:9294, pp.
1665-1667).

More recently, researchers from Argentina found that the absence of nasal
bone on first-trimester ultrasound was significantly associated with Down
syndrome. Their study was published in Prenatal Diagnosis (October 2002,
Vol. 22:10, pp.930-932).

"Having seen that we wanted to evaluate nasal bone length as a sonographic
marker in the second trimester," Benacerraf said, "because, at least in
Boston, we see most of our patients coming in for their obstetrical
ultrasound mostly in the second trimester."

"If you get a very good sagittal image, you will be able to identify the
ossification of the nasal bone quite nicely as a finite measurement you can
make," Benacerraf said. The researchers used electronic calipers to measure
from the base of the nasal bone closest to the frontal bone to the distal
extent of the ossification.

The prospective study evaluated 239 consecutive fetuses between 15 and 20
weeks gestation. The fetuses were already scheduled for an ultrasound and
subsequent amniocentesis because of high-risk factors such as advanced
maternal age and serum biochemical screening results.

Of the 239 fetuses examined, 16 were confirmed at amniocentesis as having
Down syndrome. The 16 fetuses had a mean gestational age of 17 weeks and
mothers a mean age of 37 years -- nearly identical demographics to those of
the 223 normal euploid fetuses.

However, there was a statistically significant difference between the groups
in their mean nasal bone length as measured at the second-trimester
ultrasound. Among the fetuses with Down syndrome, the mean NBL was 3.5 mm,
compared to 4.6 mm for those without Down syndrome, Benacerraf said.

To account for growth of the nasal bone with advancing gestational age, the
researchers also calculated the ratio of NBL to biparietal diameter. That
ratio ended up as a mean of 11.3 for the Down syndrome fetuses versus 8.1
for the euploid fetuses.

"This ratio among normal fetuses is pretty much constant throughout the
gestational age window that we use, which is actually very helpful,"
Benacerraf said. "It therefore suggests that a single cutoff can be used to
define abnormal regardless of this gestational age."

Using an NBL/BPD ratio of 10, the researchers were able to identify 81% of
the fetuses with Down syndrome with an 11% false-positive rate. Using a
lower ratio of 9 would have identified all of the Down syndrome fetuses but
generated too many false positives, Benacerraf said.

Interestingly, 6 of the 16 Down syndrome fetuses, or 37%, had no visible
nasal bone ossification at all, while that was the case for only one, or
0.5%, of the 223 euploid fetuses. Based on these findings, an absent nasal
bone would therefore have a likelihood ratio of 83 -- making it a more
accurate reported predictor of Down syndrome than any other sonographic
marker in the second trimester, Benacerraf said.

A majority of the Down syndrome fetuses -- 13 of the 16 -- also exhibited
other sonographic markers of aneuploidy. Of the three fetuses with no
additional markers, two had absent nasal bones, she said.

"The presence of a nasal bone is an important new marker in the detection of
fetuses with Down syndrome, which has the potential of being as accurate or
as helpful as the nuchal fold," Benacerraf concluded.

The marker could help high-risk women avoid amniocentesis or identify
possible aneuploid fetuses in low-risk women. However, Benacerraf added,
"the significance of the nasal bone as an isolated finding, particularly in
a low-risk population, has not yet been established."

By Tracie L. Thompson
AuntMinnie.com contributing writer
November 19, 2002

use when must restrict search to only the ultrasound forum...
Enter search keywords:
	Returns per screen: Require all keywords: