Re: 4D IMAGING

From: DoctorJoe@aol.com
Wed Nov 20 05:58:47 2002


In a message dated 11/19/02 22:25:24, gaperina@mindspring.com writes:

> As long a s there is no established harm, and the power
> levels are within FDA acceptable ranges, there should be absolutely no
> restrictions on ultrasonography.  Most of the innovations we have been able
> to make have been the result of technical improvements and those pioneers
> who were able to break new ground with them.
>

Couple of observations:

1) if there is truly no harm (in an otherwise medically nonindicated ultrasound), then there is no a priori medical contraindication for the procedure.

2) if there is no medical contraindication, then you can talk about secondary "contraindications," the most debated is money.

3) if money is the question, then the patient can pay for what she wants, right? Otherwise, we're practicing a bad form of paternalism. As long as you're not scamming the third-party payors, then the patient's wishes should rule.

4) back to #1 above - if BONDING is a legitimate aim, then there's actually a medical BENEFIT, and the discussion SHOULD be over.

Anything to add? hehe

Joe P.

P.S. Not to add gasoline, but how many of you have seen people, medical professionals, who have "grown up" with the development of ultrasound (when they started learning/school, ultrasound was in its infancy - as they practiced, ultrasound became 2D, 3D, 4D, technicolor, etc.), who have changed from "pro-choice" to "pro-life" by "bonding" with the babies on the screen, changing from the gut feeling of "it's just a lump of cells" to "it's a ba by"? I've seen it more than once. So I think the "bonding" idea is valid for both the patient and the doctor. Whoosh!




recommended search...
Google
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

use when must restrict search to only the ultrasound forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  Ultrasound Forum Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 05:18:59 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.