Re: NT Fetal Medicine Foundation
From: Dave Berck (djberck@yahoo.com)
Sun Aug 18 07:15:41 2002
I also do 2 stage: 11-14 for dates and NT, then
anatomy +/- cervical length at 20-21 weeks. Allows for
further workup before 24 weeks if something is found.
--- "art fougner, md" <evsono@pipeline.com> wrote:
> good 2 stage protocol -
>
> first between 11 - 14 for NT, chorionicity of twins,
> obvious anomalies.
>
> second - 21 -24 wks for structural anomalies,
> cervical length and
> possibly uterine artery doppler.
>
> art
>
> At Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Terry J DuBose wrote:
> >
> >This message is in MIME format. Since your mail
> reader does not understand
> >this format, some or all of this message may not be
> legible.
> >
> >----__JNP_000_6bee.4cfa.4b70
> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> >
> >I think most of us would like at least two scans.
> Personally, I wish I
> >could do three, one as soon as the pregnancies are
> recognized, ideally
> >5-7 weeks. That first one dates the next two. The
> second EV at the
> >start of the 9th week to learn all we can; and
> third between 22 and 25
> >(or before 30) weeks for general anatomy. But that
> is my selfish
> >curiosity, it should probably be done with porcinae
> first.
> >
> >It is amazing that we can see this early.
> >
> >Peace, Terry J DuBose, MS, RDMS
> >Little Rock Arkansas USA
> >
> >On Thu, 15 Aug 2002 20:59:18 -0500
> DoctorJoe@aol.com writes:
> >
> >In a message dated 8/15/02 20:28:44,
> hale-family@msn.com writes:
> >
> >I personally prefer to do the first scan between
> 11-14 weeks for dates
> >and basic development, the second one after 28
> weeks for development or
> >growth.
> >
> >I always like a two-scan set-up, roughly the same
> times.
> >
> >Joe P.
> >----__JNP_000_6bee.4cfa.4b70
> >Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> >
> ><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0
> Transitional//EN">
> >
> ><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #fffff "
> >face="Times New Roman" color=#4600a5 size=2
> FAMILY="SERIF">
> >I think most of us would like at least two scans.
> Personally, I wish
> >I could do three, one as soon as the pregnancies
> are recognized, ideally 5 7
> >weeks. That first one dates the next two. The
> second EV at the start
> >of the 9th week to learn all we can; and third
> between 22 and 25 (or befor 30)
> >weeks for general anatomy. But that is my selfish
> curiosity, it should
> >probably be done with porcinae first.
> >
> >It is amazing that we can see this early.
> >
> >Peace, Terry J DuBose, MS, RDMS
> >Little Rock Arkansas USA
> >
> >On Thu, 15 Aug 2002 20:59:18 -0500 <A
> >href="mailto:DoctorJoe@aol.com">DoctorJoe@aol.com
> writes:
> ><BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
> >style="PADDING-LEFT: 10px; MARGIN-LEFT: 10px;
> BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid">
> > In a message dated 8/15/02 20:28:44,
> hale-family@msn.com
> > writes:
> > <BLOCKQUOTE
> > style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px;
> BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"
> > cite="" TYPE="CITE"><FONT
> style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff
> > face="Times New Roman" color=#4600a5 size=2
> FAMILY="SERIF">I personally
> > prefer to do the first scan between 11-14 weeks
> for dates and basic
> > development, the second one after 28 weeks for
> development or
> > growth.<FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff
> > face="Times New Roman" color=#4600a5 size=2
> FAMILY="SERIF"> BR>I always
> > like a two-scan set-up, roughly the same
> times.Joe
> > P.<FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff"
> > face="Times New Roman" color=#000000 size=2
> FAMILY="SERIF">
> >
> >----__JNP_000_6bee.4cfa.4b70--
>
> --
> art fougner, md
> ich bin ein New Yorker
=====
David J. Berck, MD, MPH
HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs
http://www.hotjobs.com
|
|
