Re: NT Fetal Medicine Foundation
From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Fri Aug 16 08:04:22 2002
good 2 stage protocol -
first between 11 - 14 for NT, chorionicity of twins, obvious anomalies.
second - 21 -24 wks for structural anomalies, cervical length and
possibly uterine artery doppler.
art
At Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Terry J DuBose wrote:
>
>This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
>this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
>
>----__JNP_000_6bee.4cfa.4b70
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>I think most of us would like at least two scans. Personally, I wish I
>could do three, one as soon as the pregnancies are recognized, ideally
>5-7 weeks. That first one dates the next two. The second EV at the
>start of the 9th week to learn all we can; and third between 22 and 25
>(or before 30) weeks for general anatomy. But that is my selfish
>curiosity, it should probably be done with porcinae first.
>
>It is amazing that we can see this early.
>
>Peace, Terry J DuBose, MS, RDMS
>Little Rock Arkansas USA
>
>On Thu, 15 Aug 2002 20:59:18 -0500 DoctorJoe@aol.com writes:
>
>In a message dated 8/15/02 20:28:44, hale-family@msn.com writes:
>
>I personally prefer to do the first scan between 11-14 weeks for dates
>and basic development, the second one after 28 weeks for development or
>growth.
>
>I always like a two-scan set-up, roughly the same times.
>
>Joe P.
>----__JNP_000_6bee.4cfa.4b70
>Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
>
><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #fffff "
>face="Times New Roman" color=#4600a5 size=2 FAMILY="SERIF">
>I think most of us would like at least two scans. Personally, I wish
>I could do three, one as soon as the pregnancies are recognized, ideally 5 7
>weeks. That first one dates the next two. The second EV at the start
>of the 9th week to learn all we can; and third between 22 and 25 (or befor 30)
>weeks for general anatomy. But that is my selfish curiosity, it should
>probably be done with porcinae first.
>
>It is amazing that we can see this early.
>
>Peace, Terry J DuBose, MS, RDMS
>Little Rock Arkansas USA
>
>On Thu, 15 Aug 2002 20:59:18 -0500 <A
>href="mailto:DoctorJoe@aol.com">DoctorJoe@aol.com writes:
><BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
>style="PADDING-LEFT: 10px; MARGIN-LEFT: 10px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid">
> In a message dated 8/15/02 20:28:44, hale-family@msn.com
> writes:
> <BLOCKQUOTE
> style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"
> cite="" TYPE="CITE"><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff
> face="Times New Roman" color=#4600a5 size=2 FAMILY="SERIF">I personally
> prefer to do the first scan between 11-14 weeks for dates and basic
> development, the second one after 28 weeks for development or
> growth.<FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff
> face="Times New Roman" color=#4600a5 size=2 FAMILY="SERIF"> BR>I always
> like a two-scan set-up, roughly the same times.Joe
> P.<FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff"
> face="Times New Roman" color=#000000 size=2 FAMILY="SERIF">
>
>
>----__JNP_000_6bee.4cfa.4b70--
--
art fougner, md
ich bin ein New Yorker
