Re: GE 4D Ultrasound and Television AD - Effect on Patients!

From: DuBose, Terry (DuboseTerryJ@uams.edu)
Mon Jul 29 10:07:49 2002


Dr. Fougner, are you implying that I am making too much noise, or that we need to continue? ;-)

Peace, Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS Assistant Professor & Director, Diagnostic Medical Sonography Program University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, CHRP 4301 West Markham St. Mail Slot #563 Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205 USA 501-686-6510 http://www.io.com/~dubose/ http://www.uams.edu/CHRP/dmshome.htm http://www.obgyn.net/us/panel/panel.htm

-----Original Message----- From: evsono@pipeline.com [mailto:evsono@pipeline.com] Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2002 10:10 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND Subject: Re: GE 4D Ultrasound and Television AD - Effect on Patients!

Terry -

the squeaky wheel gets the grease.

art

At Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Terry J DuBose wrote: >
>This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
>this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
>
>----__JNP_000_5b82.3327.5390
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>Dr. Platt, this is a good first step, and I thank GE for making it.
>However, many will be waiting to see if GE "drops the other shoe" and
>instructs GE Medical Systems to only sell ultrasound instrumentation to
>individuals who have documented education (accredited, not just "3 week
>wonders") and skills in sonography... and who indicate that they will use
>it in accordance within the FDA's policies.
>
>Thanks to the AIUM for their work on this problem, but this is only the
>first step, I fear it isn't over.
>
>--
>Terry J DuBose, M.S., RDMS
>Little Rock, Arkansas USA
>
>---------------------------------------------
>
>---------------------------------------------
>On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 00:40:42 EDT LDPLATT@aol.com writes:
>---------------------------------------------
>---------------------------------------------
>In a message dated 7/27/2002 4:59:50 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
>---------------------------------------------
>---------------------------------------------
>evsono@pipeline.com writes:
>
>incidentally - is it me or has GE pulled this ad?
>
>In response to this question GE has been most responsive to the AIUM's
>input and concerns.They have pulled the ad to rewrite it and add a
>disclaimer re it's use for clinical indications only.Dr Kurtz who is out
>of town at present will shortly post some information re all the activity
>the AIUM has been involved in with GE and the FDA.I am sure you all would
> be pleased with the impact we have had with this.GE has been
>impressive in their response and how they quickly handled this situation
>that appearently came from "ccorporate GE" and not Medical Sysytems.They
>have also pulled all places from their web site that are using the 3D and
>4D only for "entertainment". Please look for Dr Kurtz s' official
>statement from the AIUM .
> Larry Platt ---
>----__JNP_000_5b82.3327.5390
>Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
>
>Dr. Platt, this is a good first step, and I thank GE for making it. nbsp;
>However, many will be waiting to see if GE "drops the other shoe" and
instructs >GE Medical Systems to only sell ultrasound instrumentation to individuals
who >have documented education (accredited, not just "3 week wonders") an
>skills in sonography... and who indicate that they will use it in
accordance >within the FDA's policies. 

>Thanks to the AIUM for their work on this problem, but this is only the
>first step, I fear it isn't over.

>Terry J DuBose, M.S., RDMS
>Little Rock, Arkansas USA

>---------------------------------------------

>---------------------------------------------
>---------------------------------------------
>---------------------------------------------
>On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 00:40:42 EDT <A
>---------------------------------------------
>href="mailto:LDPLATT@aol.com">LDPLATT@aol.com writes:
>---------------------------------------------
><BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
>---------------------------------------------
>style="PADDING-LEFT: 10px; MARGIN-LEFT: 10px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px
solid"> > In a message dated 7/27 2002
> 4:59:50 AM Pacific Daylight Time, evsono@pipeline.com
>writes:
> <BLOCKQUOTE
> style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px
solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" > TYPE="CITE">incidentally - is it me or has GE pulled this
> ad?In response to this question GE has been most
> responsive to the AIUM's input and concerns.They have pulled the ad to
rewrite > it and  add a disclaimer re it's use for clinical indications only Dr
> Kurtz who is out of town at present will shortly post some information r
all > the activity the AIUM has been involved in with GE and the FDA.I am sure
you > all would  be pleased with the impact we have had with this.GE has
> been   impressive in their response and how they quickly handled
> this situation that appearently came from "ccorporate GE" and not Medica
> Sysytems.They have also pulled all places from their web site that are
using > the 3D and 4D only for "entertainment".   Please look for Dr Kurtz
> s' official statement from the AIUM
> .            nbsp;        
> Larry  Platt ---
>
>----__JNP_000_5b82.3327.5390--
>

--
art fougner, md
ich bin ein New Yorker



recommended search...
Google
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

use when must restrict search to only the ultrasound forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  Ultrasound Forum Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 05:18:44 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.