-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Level three sonogram From: Allen Worrall (jworrall@alaska.net) Fri Jul 19 12:29:49 2002 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Allen Worrall: "Re: Level three sonogram. Perinatologists vs. Prenatologists" Previous message: art fougner, md: "Re: rules" Maybe in reply to: Karen Roersma: "Level three sonogram" Next in thread: Terry J DuBose: "Re: Level three sonogram" Hmmm, have I missed something? I was of the impression that trained and genuine perinatologist were highly skilled in prenatal sonography. I suppose there will be exceptions in any group, and of course there will be fetal echocardiologists and other sub-sub specialists who will develop skills far greater than the general perinatologist. But am I wrong to consider the perinatologist (and the sonographers who work in perinatology practices) to be at the top of the prenatal ultrasound ladder? Allen > ----- Original Message ----- From: roger sanders To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 7:02 AM Subject: Re: Level three sonogram You are correct that the level two concept started with the AFP program. Why don't the level 2 and level 3 concepts go away even though they have been condemned for years and organisations have tried to replace them with "targeted or referral" sonograms? I believe it is because the level concept serves a valuable purpose. The level one standard refers to the standard obstetrical sonogram as defined by ACR,AIUM, ACOG guidelines which we all know is the minimum legally acceptable level. We know this is not a sufficiently detailed study to rule out anomalies and that greater detail and skill is required for an anomaly scan. It isnt realistic and it is why standards are so variable in this country to think that anyone can do a more detailed anomaly scan which is what the terms "targetted scan" seems to suggest. Currently the only way of knowing who does a quality job is by repurtation. Numerous perinatologists are setting up with limite! d scanning skills to do referral scans. Some type of quality control whether by looking at results to see how often an anomaly is detected at birth or by a sophisticated accreditation scheme for individuals not labs is needed so that insurers know who deserves to get a higher payment for doing a sophisticated exam. without some sort of validation this new code will be an excuse that everyone will use to increase charges. -- Allen Worrall <jworrall@alaska.net> wrote: Dianne, excellent remarks about reimbursement. Regarding level one and two, I think those terms originated when the State of California started its MSAFP program. Some patients required a more comprehensive exam depending on the results of their screen and I think the State of California, since they were paying the bills, designated these two levels, and indicated who could do and be paid for a level 2 exam. Then, as you indicated, the less well trained or less interested practitioners of ultrasound began to say, "well, I am not culpable for missing that, because I was doing only a level one scan". The editorial by Dr. Roy Filly explains it very well. Allen > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dianne Walkup" To: "Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND" Sent: Thursday, Jul! y 18, 2002 8:14 PM Subject: Re: Level three sonogram > Greetings, The level one, two and three labels are old and never made any > sense in the first place. Im my opinion, a level one is an simply a poor > excuse for not knowing what you are doing. The old monikers, however, meant > that a level two was a comprehensive anatomy survey, and a level three was a > fetal echocardiogram. > Regarding the charges for these exams; as an expert high risk obstetrics > Sonographer working for perinatologists that know OB ultrasound, we get > reimbursed no more than the people who have no business picking up a > transducer do. As two cases in point from this week alone: one was a > referral because " the fetus is breathing and may be in serious distress", > this was a 35 week normal fetus. Breathing motion is of course a welcome > occupation for a 35 week fetus. Another this week was the one where th! e OB > doc told the patient a week ago that both of her twins were "doing just > fine, and here is one sucking his thumb and the other one grabbing its > foot". We found only one baby at 18 weeks gestation with no evidence of a > second. The referring doc said simply "I made a mistake." > Needless to say, I will welcome being able to charge (and maybe even be > properly reimbursed) for my standard exam which is always a comprehensive > anatomic survey when the new CPT codes are in effect. > Dianne Walkup, RDMS, RDCS > mitakuye oyasin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Do You Yahoo!? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes Next message: Allen Worrall: "Re: Level three sonogram. Perinatologists vs. Prenatologists" Previous message: art fougner, md: "Re: rules" Maybe in reply to: Karen Roersma: "Level three sonogram" Next in thread: Terry J DuBose: "Re: Level three sonogram"

recommended search...
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Tue Sep 2 05:31:34 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.