-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Level three sonogram From: DuBose, Terry (DuboseTerryJ@uams.edu) Wed Jul 17 12:20:16 2002 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: viv souter: "Re: Level three sonogram" Previous message: art fougner, md: "Re: Level three sonogram" Maybe in reply to: Karen Roersma: "Level three sonogram" Next in thread: Dianne Walkup: "Re: Level three sonogram" Yes... if the public can find the good ones... hopefully, word gets around. It has been said before: CAVEAT EMPTOR! Peace, Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS Assistant Professor & Director, Diagnostic Medical Sonography Program CHRP, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Little Rock, Arkansas, USA 501-686-6510 http://www.io.com/~dubose/ http://www.uams.edu/CHRP/dmshome.htm http://www.obgyn.net/us/panel/panel.htm -----Original Message----- From: evsono@pipeline.com [mailto:evsono@pipeline.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 12:15 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND Subject: Re: Level three sonogram ok - well in my neighborhood there is a large chain of radiology practices - multiple centers, etc - who are not highly regarded. there is an obstetrician who is. their studies speak for themselves. again - just my opinion - i could be wrong. art At Wed, 17 Jul 2002, DuBose, Terry wrote: > >You are correct, and Shakespeare is correct... to a point. If you call up a >florist and ask for carnations, I doubt you will get roses. There in lies >the problem... how is the public to distinguish between the expected quality >of sonography if not by credentialing or some kind of registry? Just >looking through the phonebook certainly won't tell them anything. > >Peace, Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS >Assistant Professor & Director, Diagnostic Medical Sonography Program >CHRP, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences >Little Rock, Arkansas, USA >501-686-6510 >http://www.io.com/~dubose/ >http://www.uams.edu/CHRP/dmshome.htm >http://www.obgyn.net/us/panel/panel.htm > >-----Original Message----- >From: evsono@pipeline.com [mailto:evsono@pipeline.com] >Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 9:54 AM >To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND >Subject: Re: Level three sonogram > >it's the quality of the work - not the letters of the alphabet after the >name nor the title. to put it another way - "a rose by any other name >would smell as sweet." - w shakespeare > >just my opinion - i could be wrong. > >art > >At Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Raul I. Limos wrote: >> >>On 16 Jul 2002 at 17:12, art fougner, md wrote: >> >>> right - i can see the folks linin up to request the low cost no frills >>> low quality study LOL. >>> >>> art >> >>Yeah, right. So if a radiologist, a sonographer and OB/GYN >>sonologist do a level 3 ultrasound which report would you find >>credible? >> >>OB/GYN sonologist believes she is best in doing >>obstetrics/gynecologic ultrasound because it is her/his specialty. >>The radiologist believes... The vascular sonographer believes ... >>So on so forth statements... you know the drill. > >-- >art fougner, md >ich bin ein New Yorker > -- art fougner, md ich bin ein New Yorker Next message: viv souter: "Re: Level three sonogram" Previous message: art fougner, md: "Re: Level three sonogram" Maybe in reply to: Karen Roersma: "Level three sonogram" Next in thread: Dianne Walkup: "Re: Level three sonogram"

recommended search...
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 05:18:44 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.