![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: Protocol for anatomical referencingFrom: DuBose, Terry (DuboseTerryJ@uams.edu)Mon Jul 1 16:55:03 2002
OK, so there is no "standard". We just have to specify "maternal caudal" or "fetal caudal" or some such. That is fine with me. Thank.s Peace, Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS Assistant Professor & Director, Diagnostic Medical Sonography Program CHRP, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Little Rock, Arkansas, USA 501-686-6510 http://www.io.com/~dubose/ http://www.uams.edu/CHRP/dmshome.htm http://www.obgyn.net/us/panel/panel.htm -----Original Message----- From: Philippe Jeanty [mailto:Jeanty@TheFetus.net] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:45 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND Subject: Re: Protocol for anatomical referencing Well it depends what organ you talk too..if you are guiding an amnio and what the operator to go to the feet of the mother you mention "caudal" but if you look at the baby spine (cephalic) going caudal will mean going rostral on the mom. It depends which orga and whose owner of the organ you talk about. -----Original Message----- From: ultrasound@obgyn.net [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net]On Behalf Of DuBose, Terry Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:06 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND Subject: Re: Protocol for anatomical referencing Thanks, Dr. Jeanty... is there a reference for that convention? Peace, Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS Assistant Professor & Director, Diagnostic Medical Sonography Program CHRP, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Little Rock, Arkansas, USA 501-686-6510 http://www.io.com/~dubose/ http://www.uams.edu/CHRP/dmshome.htm http://www.obgyn.net/us/panel/panel.htm -----Original Message----- From: Philippe Jeanty [mailto:Jeanty@TheFetus.net] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:50 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND Subject: Re: Protocol for anatomical referencing Fetal ! -----Original Message----- From: ultrasound@obgyn.net [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net]On Behalf Of DuBose, Terry Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:37 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND Subject: Protocol for anatomical referencing Do any of the organizations (ACOG, AIUM, SDMS, etc) have a standard for referencing anatomical terminology? For example with a fetus in the cephalic presentation, would the use of the term "caudal" refer to the fetal anatomy or maternal? Any discussion and references welcome. Thanks. Peace, Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS Assistant Professor & Director, Diagnostic Medical Sonography Program CHRP, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Little Rock, Arkansas, USA 501-686-6510 http://www.io.com/~dubose/ http://www.uams.edu/CHRP/dmshome.htm http://www.obgyn.net/us/panel/panel.htm
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:35:17 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.