Re: Another great abuse of ultrasound...

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Mon Jun 10 07:06:25 2002


Jim -

what makes you think they reimburse at all for 3d? some barely reimburse for 2d. i think they are way ahead of you.

art

At Mon, 10 Jun 2002, James S Smeltzer MD wrote: >
>Guys,
>
>Right!
>
>Let us report those who can find out what is right about a baby to save it,
>but uphold those who seek to find out what is wrong, to destroy it!
>
>The ONLY question, IMHO, is TRUTH and falsehood. False and misleading
>scans should be censured if the result of carelessness or inadequate
>technique. We should not buy GE equipment while they are promoting this 4D
>crap with no demonstration of clinical benefit. (Of course I did say this
>about color, which I use every day, Hmmm)
>
>If I were the third party payer I would NEVER pay for this 3D unless a
>diagnosis was made with it and not by 2D. I would then do a QA of the site
>in question regarding their qualification to submit for reimbursement.
>
>Jim
>
>At 02:35 PM 6/4/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>>Yes I report them to the FDA each time I find one. You can actually send an
>>email to: Press, Howard A. [HAP@CDRH.FDA.GOV]
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: ultrasound@obgyn.net [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net]On Behalf Of DuBose,
>>Terry
>>Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:22 PM
>>To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND
>>Subject: RE: Another great abuse of ultrasound...
>>
>>Dr. Jeanty, these non-medical "3D Keepsake" businesses were discussed at the
>>AIUM Bioeffects Committee last year. The FDA expressed concerned and said
>>that they would look into it... but I have heard nothing since then.
>>
>>These operations really are proliferating. Recently I heard of an
>>accredited (JCAHO) hospital (Catholic) that is going to start a "Pro-Life
>>Clinic", not for diagnostic purposes, but for "bonding".
>>
>>Peace, Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS
>>Assistant Professor & Director, Diagnostic Medical Sonography Program
>>CHRP, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
>>Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
>>501-686-6510
>>http://www.io.com/~dubose/
>>http://www.uams.edu/CHRP/dmshome.htm
>>http://www.obgyn.net/us/panel/panel.htm
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Philippe Jeanty [mailto:Jeanty@TheFetus.net]
>>Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 1:50 PM
>>To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND
>>Subject: Another great abuse of ultrasound...
>>
>>Check this site... (Found by Cheryl Turner, RDMS)
>>http://www.babys1stimpressions.com
>>

--
art fougner, md
ich bin ein New Yorker



recommended search...
Google
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

use when must restrict search to only the ultrasound forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  Ultrasound Forum Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 05:18:41 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.