Re: what is 4D- Joe
From: DuBose, Terry (DuboseTerryJ@uams.edu)
Thu May 16 11:07:06 2002
How about just a Y or N?
Peace, Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS
Assistant Professor & Director, Diagnostic Medical Sonography Program
CHRP, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
501-686-6510
http://www.io.com/~dubose/
http://www.uams.edu/CHRP/dmshome.htm
http://www.obgyn.net/us/panel/panel.htm
-----Original Message-----
From: Philippe Jeanty [mailto:Jeanty@TheFetus.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:52 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND
Subject: Re: what is 4D- Joe
Cant say :)
-----Original Message-----
From: ultrasound@obgyn.net [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net]On Behalf Of DuBose,
Terry
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:13 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND
Subject: Re: what is 4D- Joe
5D? Let's see, would that be 3D real-time + Doppler?
Peace, Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS
Assistant Professor & Director, Diagnostic Medical Sonography Program
CHRP, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
501-686-6510
http://www.io.com/~dubose/
http://www.uams.edu/CHRP/dmshome.htm
http://www.obgyn.net/us/panel/panel.htm
-----Original Message-----
From: Philippe Coquel [mailto:philippe.coquel@wanadoo.fr]
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 8:24 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND
Subject: Re: what is 4D- Joe
Is it in Stars Wars ?
ph Coquel
>----- Original Message -----
From: "Philippe Jeanty" <Jeanty@TheFetus.net>
To: "Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND"
<ultrasound@mail.medispecialty.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 2:55 PM
Subject: Re: what is 4D- Joe
> Actually I think you should hold on for 5D which should be available soon
> (but this is still under non-disclosure)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ultrasound@obgyn.net [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net]On Behalf Of Terry
J
> DuBose
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:24 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND
> Subject: Re: what is 4D- Joe
>
> That is to say... 3D in real-time, time being the 4th dimension. Terry J
> DuBose
>
> ---------------------------------
> On Thu, 16 May 2002 00:58:36 -0500 "Philippe Coquel"
> ---------------------------------
> <philippe.coquel@wanadoo.fr> writes:
> ---------------------------------
> > 3D with 16 vol/sec (Kretz GE )or 4 vol/sec (Philips ATL MEDISON)
> >
> > Ph Coquel
>> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "DR. JOE ANTONY" <jscan@vsnl.com>
> > To: "Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND"
> > <ultrasound@mail.medispecialty.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 6:57 AM
> > Subject: what is 4D- Joe
> >
> > > I have heard of 3D ultrasound. But what is 4 D?
> > > Joe.
> > > India.
>> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Philippe Jeanty <Jeanty@TheFetus.net>
> > > To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND
> > > <ultrasound@mail.medispecialty.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 8:43 PM
> > > Subject: RE: 'Use of 3-D Ultrasound'
> > >
> > > > There is currently an excellent machine that does 3D and 4D.
> > with very
> > > good
> > > > 2D and Doppler. We have had a few anomaly cases reviewed on it
> > and it
> > does
> > > > very good. Be prepared to spend quite some time to polish the
> > raw images
> > > if
> > > > you want presentation quality material. This is not very
> > intuitive
> > stuff.
> > > > My first impression is that the most useful aspect for parents
> > has been
> > > the
> > > > negative-bonding in case of sever anomalies. They perceive it
> > very well.
> > > Of
> > > > course the 3D and 4D of normal fetuses is cute but I am not too
> > sure
> > worth
> > > > the time.
> > > >
> > > > Build-in 3D is easier then add-on 3D (we had this before) Add-on
> > works
> > > very
> > > > well and is a lot cheaper but requires even more training.
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: ultrasound@obgyn.net [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net]On
> > Behalf Of art
> > > > fougner, md
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 9:46 AM
> > > > To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND
> > > > Subject: Re: 'Use of 3-D Ultrasound'
> > > >
> > > > anyone care to share his/her personal experience with 3D?
> > specifically,
> > > > am interested in opinions re: technology - software upgrade vs.
> > > > hardware, learning curve, frequency of obtaining advert quality
> > images,
> > > > etc.
> > > >
> > > > art
> > > >
> > > > At Tue, 14 May 2002, Philippe Jeanty wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >Hi Tonya,
> > > > >I respect your personal feelings but this forum is for medical
> > > > >professionals. This is not a forum to push one or another
> > philosophy. I
> > > > wish
> > > > >you well in your grieving process.
> > > > >
> > > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > > >From: ultrasound@obgyn.net [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net]On
> > Behalf Of
> > > > >Roho1212@aol.com
> > > > >Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 9:39 PM
> > > > >To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND
> > > > >Subject: "Use of 3-D Ultrasound"
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >http://www.obgyn.net/avtranscripts/3dultrasound_atlanta2000.htm
> > > > >To whom it may concern,
> > > > >I do not know who to contact, but I thought I would start here.
> > When I
> > > saw
> > > > >the commercial for 3D ultrasounds I was rivited to my chair. I
> > work at
> > > 1st
> > > > >Choice Pregnancy Resource Center, and we have been praying for
> > a way to
> > > > show
> > > > >the mothers that come to out center that the baby they carry
> > inside is
> > so
> > > > >much more than a blob of tissue. If you knoe of anyway I can
> > contact
> > the
> > > > >company that has this ultrasound, Please call me @ 903-792-5735
> > or
> > > > >902-899-0433. You see I have lived for 23 years with the shame
> > and
> > > physical
> > > > >effects of an abortion. I beleive God has found a way to show
> > us the
> > > > >miricale of life each step of the way. I don't know your views
> > on
> > > > abortion,
> > > > >but you can not image the impact this machine could have in our
> > center.
> > > > >please call me.
> > > > >
> > > > >serving Him faithfully,
> > > > >Tonya Domokos
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > art fougner, md
> > > > ich bin ein New Yorker
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
