ULTRASOUND Messages for May, 2002: Re: 'Use of 3-D Ultrasound'

Re: 'Use of 3-D Ultrasound'
From: Philippe Jeanty (Jeanty@TheFetus.net)
Wed May 15 10:13:22 2002

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: kbenirsc: "Darling"
Previous message: UltraKath@aol.com: "Re: 'Use of 3-D Ultrasound'"
In reply to: art fougner, md: "Re: 'Use of 3-D Ultrasound'"

There is currently an excellent machine that does 3D and 4D. with very good 2D and Doppler. We have had a few anomaly cases reviewed on it and it does very good. Be prepared to spend quite some time to polish the raw images if you want presentation quality material. This is not very intuitive stuff. My first impression is that the most useful aspect for parents has been the negative-bonding in case of sever anomalies. They perceive it very well. Of course the 3D and 4D of normal fetuses is cute but I am not too sure worth the time.
Build-in 3D is easier then add-on 3D (we had this before) Add-on works very well and is a lot cheaper but requires even more training.
-----Original Message----- From: ultrasound@obgyn.net [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net]On Behalf Of art fougner, md Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 9:46 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND Subject: Re: 'Use of 3-D Ultrasound'
anyone care to share his/her personal experience with 3D? specifically, am interested in opinions re: technology - software upgrade vs. hardware, learning curve, frequency of obtaining advert quality images, etc.
art
At Tue, 14 May 2002, Philippe Jeanty wrote: >
>Hi Tonya,
>I respect your personal feelings but this forum is for medical
>professionals. This is not a forum to push one or another philosophy. I
wish >you well in your grieving process.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ultrasound@obgyn.net [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net]On Behalf Of
>Roho1212@aol.com
>Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 9:39 PM
>To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND
>Subject: "Use of 3-D Ultrasound"
>
>http://www.obgyn.net/avtranscripts/3dultrasound_atlanta2000.htm
>To whom it may concern,
>I do not know who to contact, but I thought I would start here. When I saw
>the commercial for 3D ultrasounds I was rivited to my chair. I work at 1st
>Choice Pregnancy Resource Center, and we have been praying for a way to
show >the mothers that come to out center that the baby they carry inside is so
>much more than a blob of tissue. If you knoe of anyway I can contact the
>company that has this ultrasound, Please call me @ 903-792-5735 or
>902-899-0433. You see I have lived for 23 years with the shame and physical
>effects of an abortion. I beleive God has found a way to show us the
>miricale of life each step of the way. I don't know your views on
abortion, >but you can not image the impact this machine could have in our center.
>please call me.
>
>serving Him faithfully,
>Tonya Domokos

-- art fougner, md ich bin ein New Yorker

Next message: kbenirsc: "Darling"
Previous message: UltraKath@aol.com: "Re: 'Use of 3-D Ultrasound'"
In reply to: art fougner, md: "Re: 'Use of 3-D Ultrasound'"

Return to Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 05:18:39 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.

use when must restrict search to only the ultrasound forum...
Enter search keywords:
	Returns per screen: Require all keywords: