|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Ultrasound measuments of LUS to evaluate the risk of uterine ruptureFrom: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)Mon Feb 25 11:04:59 2002
At Sun, 24 Feb 2002, dracheng@yahoo.com wrote: > >At Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Sabina Norderhaug wrote: >> >>>From what I know, 1 cm is quite a thick uterus and there are very few >>women after caserean who will have such a thick LUS before the delivery. >>May be you are talking about some certain measuring technique? Is this >>number based on your own experience? Can you please explain more? >> >>According to Patrick Rozenberg and others' study for transabdominal >>measurements: >> >>FINDINGS: The overall frequency of defective scars was 4.0% (15 uterine >>ruptures and 10 dehiscences). The frequency of defects rose as the >>thickness of the lower uterine segment decreased: there were no defects >>among 278 women with measurements grea
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:31:30 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.