-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

R: ULTRASOUND digest 1477 From: Alfio Cavallaro (alcava@dimtel.nti.it) Sun Jan 13 14:51:49 2002 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: James S Smeltzer MD: "Re: R: ULTRASOUND digest 1477" Previous message: Alfio Cavallaro: "R: ULTRASOUND digest 1477" Next in thread: James S Smeltzer MD: "Re: R: ULTRASOUND digest 1477" Reply: James S Smeltzer MD: "Re: R: ULTRASOUND digest 1477" >From recephas@superonline.com Sun Jan 13 15:51:46 2002 Received: from fep01.superonline.com (fep01.superonline.com [212.252.122.40]) by mail.medispecialty.com (8.11.6/8.11.6/dsb-1.1) with ESMTP id g0DLpet17670 for <ultrasound@obgyn.net>; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 15:51:41 -0600 Received: from rh ([212.253.78.46]) by fep01.superonline.com with SMTP id <20020113214710.CEBS22637.fep01@rh> for <ultrasound@obgyn.net>; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 23:47:10 +0200 Reply-To: <recephas@superonline.com> From: "recephas" <recephas@superonline.com> To: <ultrasound@obgyn.net> Subject: Re: tri-amniotic, tri-chorionic pregnancy with fetal malformations Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 00:02:17 +0200 Message-ID: <NEENKIDLCNLPKDEFKEFJIEDJCCAA.recephas@superonline.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <001201c19c3c$779e04e0$c906f0d5@pedja> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal Dear Alexandra, Thank you for your comment. This woman absolutely had tri-amniotic, tri-chorionic pregnancy. She had been scanned at the first trimester, and chorionicity was clearly defined. (She became pregnant following ovulation induction.) Anencephalic fetus is female, the others, e.i. healthy fetus and hydrocephalic one are male, and their placentas far to each other.) Recep Has -----Original Message----- From: ultrasound@obgyn.net [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net]On Behalf Of Novakov Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 4:08 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND Subject: Re: tri-amniotic, tri-chorionic pregnancy with fetal malformations Dear Recep, yes I would suggest both of the procedures, since that would minimize the possibilities of the third, normal fetus to be born prematurely, BUT ONLY if you are absolutely sure it is TRICHORIONIC pregnancy. Aleksandra >----- Original Message ----- From: recephas <recephas@superonline.com> To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND <ultrasound@mail.medispecialty.com> Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 11:16 Subject: tri-amniotic, tri-chorionic pregnancy with fetal malformations > > Dear colleagues, > > I have detected a tri-amnitic, tri-chorionic 30 week pregnancy, yesterday. > > 1. One of the fetusses was anencephalic, and had severe polihydramnios. > 2. Second fetus had spina bifida and "banana sign" and mild > ventriculomegaly. This fetus also had IUGR, and its' measures consistent > with 26 weeks of gestation. > 3.Third fetus seemed healthy. > > What is your suggestions for menagement of this pregnancy? > 1. Do you offer fetocid for the second fetus? > 2. Do you suggest amnioreduction for polyhydramnios? > > Thank you for your interest. > > Recep Has, MD. > University of Istanbul > Faculty of Medicine > Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology > Next message: James S Smeltzer MD: "Re: R: ULTRASOUND digest 1477" Previous message: Alfio Cavallaro: "R: ULTRASOUND digest 1477" Next in thread: James S Smeltzer MD: "Re: R: ULTRASOUND digest 1477" Reply: James S Smeltzer MD: "Re: R: ULTRASOUND digest 1477"

recommended search...
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 05:18:29 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.