Re: ULTRASOUND digest 1422

From: Donna Hale (hale-family@msn.com)
Sun Nov 18 19:43:08 2001


>From moot@mediaone.net Sun Nov 18 20:43:06 2001
Received: from jxmls03.se.mediaone.net (jxmls03.se.mediaone.net [24.129.0.111]) by mail.medispecialty.com (8.11.6/8.11.6/dsb-1.1) with ESMTP id fAJ2h5Q20569 for <ultrasound@obgyn.net>; Sun, 18 Nov 2001 20:43:06 -0600 Received: from ashton ([66.56.78.87]) by jxmls03.se.mediaone.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id fAJ2i9X10090 for <ultrasound@obgyn.net>; Sun, 18 Nov 2001 21:44:09 -0500 (EST) From: "Moot" <moot@mediaone.net> To: <ultrasound@obgyn.net> Subject: Re: density of amniotic fluid Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 21:45:41 -0500 Message-ID: <BPEOIEIGIENLPKMJHGIHKEMLCDAA.moot@mediaone.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20011118.190912.-3920047.3.tjdubose@juno.com>

I will see if I can find some images. One way of elaborating the visual discrepancy between the two is to compare the homogeneous dispersion of meconium in AF to the appearance of a typical endometrioma. Vernix in AF on the other hand shows up as suspension with heterogeneous particulate matter, finer particles remain dispersed, larger particles swirl and sink to the floor. Koolaid vs. orange juice.

Mary C. Scarboro

-----Original Message----- From: ultrasound@obgyn.net [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net]On Behalf Of Terry J DuBose Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2001 8:01 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND Subject: Re: density of amniotic fluid

Mary, this statement is very interesting: "Vernix never seems quite as homogenous when held in AF suspension as meconium." Can you elaborate, or do you have comparitive images that you can post?

Thanks for your participation. Terry J DuBose ------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Sun, 18 Nov 2001 18:23:34 -0600 "Moot" <moot@mediaone.net> writes: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > I have read that this finding is approximately 50/50
------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -vernix/meconium.
> However, in my experience (and yes, I have seen this quite a number
> of
> times) it represented meconium 9 X's out of 10. Vernix never seems
> quite as
> homogenous when held in AF suspension as meconium.
> Mary C. Scarboro
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ultrasound@obgyn.net [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net]On Behalf Of
> MONTSEALEGRE
> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2001 1:29 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND
> Subject: density of amniotic fluid
>
> I was performing a scan of a pregnant women at 37 w. The density of
> the
> amniotic fluid was identical to the density of the placenta, then
> the
> umbilical cord was an hipoechogenic estructure going through the
> ecodense
> fluid, the IP of the umbilical artery was normal, the amount of
> amniotic
> fluid was also normal, and was no infection signs nor bleeding.What
> do you
> think about?




recommended search...
Google
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

use when must restrict search to only the ultrasound forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  Ultrasound Forum Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 05:18:24 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.