Re: Nuchal Translucency

From: Philippe Coquel (philippe.coquel@wanadoo.fr)
Thu Aug 30 09:03:48 2001


I think so BUT you have: stations, tracks, engines and cars Cross your continent like one hundred years ago. You can do it

Ph Coquel,MD

>----- Original Message -----
From: "art fougner, md" <evsono@pipeline.com> To: "Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND" <ultrasound@mail.medispecialty.com> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 3:04 PM Subject: Re: Nuchal Translucency

> in the US we're apparently still waitin at the station.
>
> art
>
> At Thu, 30 Aug 2001, Philippe Coquel wrote:
> >
> >I give you some precisions
> >In France, the 12 wa examination is a standard and include nuchal
> >translucency measure.
> >Most of physicians interested by fetal ultrasonography use the King' s
> >college tools and MoM
> >The others use 3 mm cut-off
> >The most important problem is the integration and the combinaison of
results > >of the nuchal translucency measure with the results of biochemical
screening > >to avoid useless amniocentesis and the death of normal fetus if you use
> >separately the results of the two tests and you choose the worse .
> >Currently, the biochemical screening is realised at 15-16 wa.
> >We think that the time will soon come when biochemical screening will be
> >achieved at 12 wa, like in the King's college protocols (PAPA)
> >
> >There is always inertia in diffusion of medical techniques, above all
when > >there are medicolegal implications
> >In the trains, there are engine(s) and caboose(s). 3 mm cut-off is in
the > >caboose. But all are on the train
> >
> >Ph Coquel,MD
> >

>> >>----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Doc Gynéco" <jmbr@wanadoo.fr>
> >To: "Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND"
> ><ultrasound@mail.medispecialty.com>
> >Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 6:44 PM
> >Subject: Re: Nuchal Translucency
> >
> >> --> Message de Philippe Coquel :
> >>
> >> > In France, we use the MoM to analyse nuchal translucency
> >>
> >> Joke isn't it ! I'm laughing out loud.
> >>
> >> Some of us (in France) work like that but the majority don't.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Bien tropicalement,
> >> Dr J-M BRIDERON (MD) Gyn-Obs
> >> ECHOLIST : liste de diffusion sur l'echographie gyn-obs
> >> http://www.gyneweb.fr/echolist.htm
> >>
>
> --
> art fougner, md
>
> A series of 1000 cases begins with but a single anecdote.




recommended search...
Google
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

use when must restrict search to only the ultrasound forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  Ultrasound Forum Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Sat Aug 2 05:12:08 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.