Re: Nuchal Translucency

From: Philippe Coquel (philippe.coquel@wanadoo.fr)
Wed Aug 29 02:07:12 2001


So me In France, we use the MoM to analyse nuchal translucency Not in USA?

Ph Coquel,MD

>----- Original Message -----
From: "zalel" <zalel_y@netvision.net.il> To: "Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND" <ultrasound@mail.medispecialty.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:38 AM Subject: Re: Nuchal Translucency

> Perfectly aggree!!
>
> Yaron Zalel, MD

>> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <chris@astraia.com>
> To: "Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND"
> <ultrasound@mail.medispecialty.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 11:37 PM
> Subject: Re: Nuchal Translucency
>
> > It is slightly depressing after all these years to hear the old 'NT >3
> > mm' trotted out yet again. Could I point out that in the most recent
> > analysis of the King's data, the 95th centile for NT varies from 1.9 mm
> > at CRLEmm to 2.6 mm at CRL„mm.
> >
> > --
> > Chris Harris
> > astraia software, Munich, Germany
> >
>




recommended search...
Google
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

use when must restrict search to only the ultrasound forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  Ultrasound Forum Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 05:18:19 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.