|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Nuchal TranslucencyFrom: Doc Gyn=?ISO-8859-1?B?6Q==?=co (jmbr@wanadoo.fr)Thu Aug 23 12:52:59 2001
--> Message de Philippe Coquel :
> In theory with Nicolaides'data: The nuchal translucency goes beyond the first layer "genetics at a glance". And to day we can write : "Good news : the caryotype is normal. Bad news : the caryotype is normal" (Y. VILLE in Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18: 5-8). 1) equal amount will suffer from another aneuploidy such as turner or edwards syndrome 2) and from 14 % (NT 3,5 to 4,4 mm) to 69 % (NT > 6,4 mm) will run into some adverse outcome (fetal defects (CVS), spontaneous abortions, intrauterine deaths and so on) The chance of a livebirth with no defects in the group with NT of : 3.5-4.4 mm was 86% 4.5-5.4 mm it was 77% 5.5-6.4 mm it was 67% 6.5 mm and more it was 31% SOUKA A.P «Outcome of pregnancy in chromosomally normal fetuses with increased nuchal translucency in the first trimester» Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18:9-17
-- Bien tropicalement, Dr J-M BRIDERON (MD) Gyn-Obs ECHOLIST : liste de diffusion sur l'echographie gyn-obs http://www.gyneweb.fr/echolist.htm
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 05:18:19 2008 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.