Re: fetal Heart rate....Basic/Advance OB ultrasound report

From: DuBose, Terry (DuboseTerryJ@uams.edu)
Tue Aug 7 16:14:45 2001


My associates don't call me Verbose DuBose for nothing! ;-)

I type every character... but will use a cut and paste from prior documents if I have any. I don't even use a secretary for formal letters... I do ALL my own transcription.

I'll take your comment as a compliment... thanks.

Peace, Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS, APS Assistant Professor & Director, Diagnostic Medical Sonography Program CHRP, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Little Rock, Arkansas, USA 501-686-6510 http://www.io.com/~dubose/ http://www.uams.edu/CHRP/dmshome.htm http://www.obgyn.net/us/panel/panel.htm

-----Original Message----- From: Dr Fazeel uz Zaman [mailto:fazeel@atd.hazara.net.pk] Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 3:57 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND Subject: Re: fetal Heart rate....Basic/Advance OB ultrasound report

Dear tery .......... thanks for the prompt reply. Now tell me do u actually type your answers or have got some speech-to-text stuff?? You are prolific writer and answerer........if there is such a term. Dr. Fazeel

"DuBose, Terry" wrote:

> Dr. Fazeel, that is a very old [mid]wife's tale. In fact that was the
> question that came up that led to my first notice of the heart rate curve.
> In 1982 I had started working with personal computers... first was a
> Sinclair Z80A with 2k of ram, and saving files to audio tape... not very
> dependable. By 1984 I had a DOS machine, wrote the first version of BASIC
> BABY (written in Basic programming language, thus the name) and we started
> accumulating data. We (Austin Radiological Association, Austin Texas)
were > actually trying to develop more accurate estimates for fetal weight and
age. > We gave 1000 women self-addressed post cards asking about birthing
> information, weight, length, birth date, APGAR, days before discharge, and
> gender of the fetus.
>
> Once we started getting information back, someone mentioned this tale that
> her aunt had told her. She asked "Can you see if it is true that the
heart > rate predicts the sex of the baby?" It was fairly easy to plot out the
> data, and run an ANOVA on the heart rates for males and females. The
> following image is the actual plot from the 1994-1987 data:
> http://www.obgyn.net/english/pubs/features/dubose/Image13.gif
> The pink circles are female, and the blue squares are males... confirmed
at > birth, with heart rates measured during pregnancy via M-mode. You can see
> there is no difference in males or females.
>
> While we found no difference in male and female heart rates, it was that
> plot that first showed the feed-back damping curve of the developing human
> heart. It was then that I realized that a linear regression on the EHR
> could be used to estimate embryonic age (before the curve peaked). It was
> about 10 years later (1994) that we realized the significance of the low
> EHRs and that there was not a single threshold but is also age dependent.
> I, and others, have worked up numerous higher order polynomials to
describe > the heart rate curve. See: DuBose TJ, FETAL SONOGRAPHY, W. B. Saunders
Co. > 1996, Chapter 12, Heart Rate.
>
> It has now been over 15 years that I have studied the embryofetal heart
> rate. I can assure you there is absolutely no statistical difference in
> female or male heart rates at any time in gestation. It is more age
> dependent before about 15-18 weeks, and depends upon other factors in the
> last half of pregnancy such as fetal activity and maternal sugar intake.
>
> Please have your colleague read the following:
> http://www.obgyn.net/english/pubs/features/dubose/ehr-age.htm
> and
> http://www.obgyn.net/us/cotm/0001/ehr2000.htm




recommended search...
Google
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

use when must restrict search to only the ultrasound forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  Ultrasound Forum Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Fri Jan 2 05:20:42 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.