|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Help requested for a conferenceFrom: Superonline (recephas@superonline.com)Tue Jun 19 14:52:55 2001
Dear Ferreira, One example for discordance between prenatal diagnosis and postnatal pathologic findings is about Dand-Walker malformations, (wrong measurement of cysterna magna!, wrong evaluation of vermian dysgenesis!). You can read the article of Carroll et. al. published in Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gyneclology. Carroll ASM, Porter H.... Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 149-153 The other subjects may be false diagnosis of Esophagela atresia (small staomach with polyhydramnios! -is not well correlates), and false diagnosis of Duodenal atresia (false Double-Bubble sign!) Best regards, Recep Has, MD University of Istanbul Faculty of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology e-mail: recephas@superonline.com -----Original Message----- From: ultrasound@obgyn.net [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net]On Behalf Of Jose Ferreira Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 10:05 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND Subject: Help requested for a conference I am a Obstetrician and Clinical Geneticist at Garcia de Orta Hospital, ALMADA, PORTUGAL One of my colleagues, Manuel Hermida, was invited to present a talk at the World Congress of Perinatal Medicine to be held in Barcelona, Spain on Sptember 23-27, 2001 on 'Errors in fetal ultrasound', which is a hell of a subject. There are not that many people reporting errors in literature. We believe that the intention of the organizers is to get information on false positives (of false negatives is the world full). Meaning, cases in which something was diagnosed but that was not there once the baby was born. We actually ha a case like that (it looked like a small encephalocele but there was nothing). But it was just a case! We believe that everybody had, sometimes a sporadic experience like that and thought that it would be interesting to ask professionals for cases they have had like this to help us on this task! Obviously all the credits will be publicly made available. If you have any case, especially if you have images, that wouldn't mind to share in this setting, we would be very appreciative of your collaboration! We would like to thank you all for all suggestions and stories you may have. Please e-mail me privately.
-- Jose Ferreira, MD Ob.Gyn. Dept. Garcia de Orta Hospital Almada Portugal
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Tue Sep 2 05:31:04 2008 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.