-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Isthmical-Cervical_ectopic_pregnancy From: zalel (zalel_y@netvision.net.il) Fri Jun 8 09:24:09 2001 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Sandra D Coleman: "Uterine synechia or amniotic band?" Previous message: art fougner, md: "Re: New PC-- no holy war" Dr. Bacigalupo! First of all you have to cheque if it's not a threatened abortion. If it's not and you diagnose a cervical pregnancy, eccept for MTX suggested in the literature, we use in our department Cervical suture (Shirodkar) with aspiration of the gest sac. It works well Best regards Yaron Zalel, MD >----- Original Message ----- From: "Terry J DuBose" <tjdubose@juno.com> To: "Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND" <ultrasound@mail.medispecialty.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 12:45 PM Subject: Re: Isthmical-Cervical_ectopic_pregnancy > Dr. Bacigalupo, I have not seen a cervical pregnancy as late as 10 weeks. > The FHR should be faster than 150-155 B/M at that time > (http://www.obgyn.net/us/cotm/0001/ehr2000.htm )... I suspect that it is > an impending loss. > > We would be pleased to post a couple of good images of this case once you > know the outcome, if you wish. > > Thanks for your participation, and good luck. > > Terry J DuBose, M.S., RDMS, APS > Little Rock, Arkansas USA > > ------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------ > On Wed, 6 Jun 2001 02:02:38 -0300 "Cecilia L. Bacigalupo" > ------------------------------------------------ > <bacigalupo@way.com.ar> writes: > > A patient received this diagnosis today (Abdominal scan)...Apparently > > itīs a 10 w pregnancy, located at 2mm from the external > > os,intracervical... > > By tomorrow Iīll get the images,(only a phone call till now). > > She was told about surgery, MTX,etc. > > Iīve only seen 3 cervical pregnancies and would like to forget the > > experience... > > I think itīs probably only a low implantation, or perhaps missed > > abortion, but Iīm curious. > > An Internet search wasnīt very enlightening. > > Have any of you ever seen one of these alive at 10.2 w, FHR > > 134,patient not bleeding, mild pelvic pain? > > Please forgive my english...never was good and doesnīt get better > > with sleepless working nights. > > Thanks . > > > > Cecilia Bacigalupo,MD. > > La Plata, > > Argentina. > > bacigalupo@way.com.ar > > > Next message: Sandra D Coleman: "Uterine synechia or amniotic band?" Previous message: art fougner, md: "Re: New PC-- no holy war"

recommended search...
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 05:18:14 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.