Re: what are the problems in Ob ultrasound

From: Ph Coquel (philippe.coquel@wanadoo.fr)
Mon Apr 2 05:12:49 2001


The two other abstracts about EIF

--
Ph Coquel,MD

Isolated echogenic foci in the fetal heart as marker of chromosomal abnormality

I. C. Huggon, A. C. Cook, J. M. Simpson, N. C. Smeeton* and G. K. Sharland

Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 17 (1), 11-16

Abstract

Objective To assess the effect of echogenic foci in the fetal heart on the risk for Down's syndrome.

Design Prospective evaluation of fetal echocardiograms at a fetal cardiology referral center and systematic postnatal follow-up. A relative risk was calculated from the prevalence of echogenic foci in fetuses subsequently demonstrated to have trisomy 21 divided by that in normal fetuses. For a subgroup of 548 fetuses with echogenic foci but otherwise normal detailed anomaly scans, the expected number of trisomy 21 fetuses calculated from maternal age risks was compared with the observed number to derive a relative risk for isolated echogenic foci.

Results Echogenic foci occurred in 905 of 6904 fetuses scanned, but after excluding those referred specifically because of an echogenic focus and those with heart defects, the incidence was 9.5%. Overall, echogenic foci were more frequent in fetuses with trisomy 21 than those without by a factor of 2.93. For the 548 fetuses with echogenic foci but otherwise normal detailed anomaly scans, the actual number of trisomy 21 fetuses exceeded that expected on the basis of maternal age risks by a factor of 5.54. Combination with data from several previous studies suggests a consensus relative risk of about 3.0.

Conclusions Echogenic foci are associated with increased risk of trisomy 21 even when present as an isolated finding. Their significance in an individual should be interpreted in the light of prior risk assessment based on maternal age and results of any first-trimester screening tests. We suggest that the prior risk is increased by a factor of 3.0.

Brown DL Roberts, D. J.Miller, W. A.

J ultrasound Med 1994 13 613-6 >Isolated echogenic foci in the fetal heart as marker of chromosomal >abnormality

Abstract

Echogenic foci within the left ventricle of the heart have been found in a minority of fetuses and generally are believed to be a normal variant. The cause and exact location of these foci have remained speculative, however. We identified three fetuses with this sonographic finding in whom pathologic correlation was available. The only consistent histologic finding present in all three fetuses was mineralization within a papillary muscle; the chordae tendineae were normal. One of the three fetuses had trisomy 21. Echogenic foci within the left ventricle of the fetal heart represent papillary muscle mineralization. Until more data are available to investigate any possible association with aneuploidy, an echogenic focus in the left ventricle should still be considered a normal variant.

>----- Original Message ----- From: "Terry J DuBose" <TJDuBose@juno.com> To: "Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND" <ultrasound@mail.medispecialty.com> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 3:45 AM Subject: Re: what are the problems in Ob ultrasound

> Dr. Coquel, Thanks for the references... I found the following > abstract of one of your references with a search from: > http://www.obgyn.net/medline.asp. It is interesting. Unfortunately the > other two did not come up in the search. >




recommended search...
Google
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

use when must restrict search to only the ultrasound forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  Ultrasound Forum Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 05:18:09 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.