Re: 3D
From: phillipsbill (phillipsbill@msn.com)
Mon Mar 19 19:45:25 2001
Maybe you should checkout the Sono Real at http://www.biomedicom.com
I have tried this 3D system an it really works.
>----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrea Corda" <acord@tin.it>
To: "Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND"
<ultrasound@mail.medispecialty.com>
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 1:46 PM
Subject: R: 3D
> I agree.
> I'm waiting to put my hands on a Kretz 730 (the so-called 4d) because
> spending time to build a 3d image on a 530 is a waste (of time and money
and
> does not really help in diagnosis)
> Andrea Corda MD
>> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <DuboseTerryJ@uams.edu>
> To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND
> <ultrasound@mail.medispecialty.com>
> Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 5:26 PM
> Subject: RE: 3D
>
> >Obviously 3D takes more time... at this time. Hopefully, newer
generations
> >of chips and more sophisticated software will give us real-time 3D in the
> >not too distant time. Only then will we avoid the detriment to Forum
time.
> >It is only a matter of time.
> >
> >Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS, Assistant Professor
> >Director, Diagnostic Medical Sonography Program
> >CHRP, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
> >Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
> >501-686-6510
> >http://www.io.com/~dubose/
> >http://www.uams.edu/CHRP/dmshome.htm
> >http://www.obgyn.net/us/panel/panel.htm
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: evsono@pipeline.com [mailto:evsono@pipeline.com]
> >Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 7:53 AM
> >To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND
> >Subject: Re: 3D
> >
> >what seems to be missing in any consideration of 3d is the effect on
> >acquisition time on patient throughput - a real concern for the busy
> >laboratory. further, although volumes can be later analyzed and
> >manipulated, when is this taking place and who is doing the analysis?
> >and will this cut into forum time?
> >
> >art
> >
> >At Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Allen Worrall wrote:
> >>
> >>Just back from the AIUM meeting in Orlando, and we missed Martin and
Terry
> >>very much.
> >>
> >>I have never used 3D or even seen it in use, but the presentations at
this
> >>meeting make me wish I had it. It would make obtaining the midsagittal
> >views
> >>for nuchal translucency much easier, using the multiplanar methods.
Those
> >>who use it can present many very impressive examples of it is used in
> >>clarifying or simplifying a diagnosis or measurement.
> >>
> >>I think in another ten years it will be the standard for high end
> machines.
> >>But it will be too expensive and too difficult to justify for me to ever
> >>have it.
> >>
> >>Allen
> >
> >--
> >art fougner, md
> >
> >A series of 1000 cases begins with but a single anecdote.
> >
>
