-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: 3D From: DuboseTerryJ@uams.edu Mon Mar 19 09:26:04 2001 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Ph Coquel: "Re: R: Calculation of Risk for Down" Previous message: DuboseTerryJ@uams.edu: "Re: BPP..1" Maybe in reply to: art fougner, md: "3D" Next in thread: Allen Worrall: "Re: 3D" Obviously 3D takes more time... at this time. Hopefully, newer generations of chips and more sophisticated software will give us real-time 3D in the not too distant time. Only then will we avoid the detriment to Forum time. It is only a matter of time. Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS, Assistant Professor Director, Diagnostic Medical Sonography Program CHRP, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Little Rock, Arkansas, USA 501-686-6510 http://www.io.com/~dubose/ http://www.uams.edu/CHRP/dmshome.htm http://www.obgyn.net/us/panel/panel.htm -----Original Message----- From: evsono@pipeline.com [mailto:evsono@pipeline.com] Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 7:53 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND Subject: Re: 3D what seems to be missing in any consideration of 3d is the effect on acquisition time on patient throughput - a real concern for the busy laboratory. further, although volumes can be later analyzed and manipulated, when is this taking place and who is doing the analysis? and will this cut into forum time? art At Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Allen Worrall wrote: > >Just back from the AIUM meeting in Orlando, and we missed Martin and Terry >very much. > >I have never used 3D or even seen it in use, but the presentations at this >meeting make me wish I had it. It would make obtaining the midsagittal views >for nuchal translucency much easier, using the multiplanar methods. Those >who use it can present many very impressive examples of it is used in >clarifying or simplifying a diagnosis or measurement. > >I think in another ten years it will be the standard for high end machines. >But it will be too expensive and too difficult to justify for me to ever >have it. > >Allen -- art fougner, md A series of 1000 cases begins with but a single anecdote. Next message: Ph Coquel: "Re: R: Calculation of Risk for Down" Previous message: DuboseTerryJ@uams.edu: "Re: BPP..1" Maybe in reply to: art fougner, md: "3D" Next in thread: Allen Worrall: "Re: 3D"

recommended search...
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Tue Dec 2 05:15:36 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.