-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: MSTS Risk From: Doc Gyn=?ISO-8859-1?B?6Q==?=co (jmbr@wanadoo.fr) Wed Feb 14 09:45:44 2001 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Richard M. Roberts: "Re: MSTS Risk" Previous message: art fougner, md: "Re: MSTS Risk" In reply to: Wayne Persutte: "MSTS Risk" le 13/02/01 16:32, Wayne Persutte a tapoté : > Can anyone explain to me why a Maternal serum triple screen that provides a > odds ratio of 1:1 is actually a risk of 50%? prevalence (or risk) = odds / (odds +1) 1/(1+1) = 1/2 = 0,5 = 50% -- Regards Dr J-M BRIDERON (MD) Gyn-Obs ECHOLIST : http://www.gyneweb.fr/echolist.htm Next message: Richard M. Roberts: "Re: MSTS Risk" Previous message: art fougner, md: "Re: MSTS Risk" In reply to: Wayne Persutte: "MSTS Risk"

recommended search...
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Tue Dec 2 05:15:29 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.