ULTRASOUND Messages for December, 2000: Re: Informal Case: Unusual Yolk

Re: Informal Case: Unusual Yolk
From: acord@tin.it
Fri Dec 29 05:47:05 2000

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: zalel yaron: "=?iso-8859-8-i?B?4fLw6envOiBFY2hvZ2VuaWMgcm91bmQgMm1tIGZvY3Vz?"
Previous message: Marnie: "Echogenic round 2mm focus"

> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
> <HTML>
> <HEAD>
>
> <META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
> <META content='"MSHTML 4.72.2106.6"' name=GENERATOR>
> </HEAD>
> <BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
> <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Hi - I am a first time pregnant
woman.  > </FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>I had a vaginal altrasound and I saw the
baby's >
> heart beat.  When the doctor explained the altrasound.  He said
the >
> shape of the yolk sac was something we'd be watching.  It wasn't
something >
> he was necessarily concerned with but he said it's supposed to be round
and > mine
> was more egg shaped.  I wasn't aware the shape had anything to do
with > pregnancy.   Can you give me some suggestions or opinions on how
the >
> shape of the yolk sac affects my pregnancy & what it actually
means?  > I
> don't even know exactly what the yolk sac actually is.</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2>My doctor originally thought I was 9 weeks pregnant but
after >
> the altrasound the radiologist thinks maybe I'm only approximately 5 weeks

> pregnant.  The reason I went in for an altrasound is that I started

> spotting approximately 5 days ago.  It started out real dark and
> light.  By today it is red and more heavy.  The doctor told me
this >
> was normal as he thinks it was caused from the baby attaching to the
uterine > wall.  I guess I just have more questions as to why I'd still be
> bleeding.  I'm kinda scared I could be having a miscarriage although
the >
> bleeding isn't real heavy or accompanied by any blood

clots.</FONT></DIV> > <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2>I'd appreciate any information you may be able to give
me on >
> this issue.</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2>Thanks in advance for any help & answers you can
> provide.</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2>BECCI</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

Next message: zalel yaron: "=?iso-8859-8-i?B?4fLw6envOiBFY2hvZ2VuaWMgcm91bmQgMm1tIGZvY3Vz?"
Previous message: Marnie: "Echogenic round 2mm focus"

Return to Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 05:17:55 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.

use when must restrict search to only the ultrasound forum...
Enter search keywords:
	Returns per screen: Require all keywords: