![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Re: Ovulation kits vs. basal tempsFrom: Harvey S. Marchbein, M.D. (anonymous@obgyn.net)Sat, 20 Nov 1999 23:32:55 -0600 (CST)
At Fri, 19 Nov 1999, Julie wrote: > >I have been using the Answer ovulation kits all this week. They have >shown positive results since Monday. The test line was thinner on two >days than the reference line, but it was just as dark as the reference >line. The other days, both lines were the same color and width. My >temps were in the low 97 range until yesterday (Thursday), when my temp >went up to 98.0 (it was 97.3 the day before). So, when I did an >ovulation test yesterday morning and saw it still said positive, I was >confused. I did another test yesterday afternoon, which did not show >positive. However, I took my temp and did a test this morning, and the >temp was 98.2 and the test showed positive, with the test line being >darker than the reference line. I am very confused as to which I should >go by - the kit or my body temp. I've had regular temps in the mid to >low 97 range since my period on 10/30, so this spike seems to indicate I >have ovulated, but with the test still showing positive, I just don't >know. I can't tell by my cervical mucas because we have had intercourse >regularly, and I don't want to confuse sperm for mucas. Sorry so long, >but if anyone can help, I'd sure appreciate it. Thanks a lot! When the results are confusing, I find the BBT (temps) more reliable. For some reason, the Ov. kits sometimes gives you too many days.
-- Harvey S. Marchbein, M.D. FACOG, FACS Great Neck, New York
|
| |
Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | internationale-mail | about us | advertising | our sponsors | contact us | disclaimer | This information is provided for educational purposes only. Please read the disclaimer. ©1996-2008, all rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission of MediSpecialty.com |