![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Re: General Anesthesia for Vaginal DeliveryFrom: William D. McIntosh, MD (anonymous@obgyn.net)Thu, 30 Sep 1999 11:49:14 -0500 (CDT)
At Wed, 29 Sep 1999, Alicia wrote: > >Do any doctors still deliver babies of moms under general anesthesia? >I'm told the risks are slightly higher than those of epidural, etc., but >also that a general is safe and precautions are taken so that you don't >aspirate stomach contents, which was the main reason generals fell from >favor. What I'm getting at is... is general anesthesia so dangerous as >to eliminate it as an option for a normal, healthy pregnant woman? One >who has heard all the arguments for being "awake" during delivery, and >how much "better" an epidural is, and still thinks it's the right choice >for her? > >Alicia I am unaware of anyone doing vaginal deliveries under general anesthesia. This would have substantial risks, both to mother and baby. We try to avoid general even with C/S, when we can control the length of time the fetus is exposed to the anesthetic agents down to just a few minutes. You have no such control over vaginal delivery. The fetus could well be unable to breath or move upon delivery. Not to mention that the mother would be unable to push, thereby demanding an operative delivery. General anesthesia is NOT a reasonable option for a healthy woman planning vaginal delivery.
-- William D. McIntosh, MD, FACOG Clarksville, TN
|
| |
Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | internationale-mail | about us | advertising | our sponsors | contact us | disclaimer | This information is provided for educational purposes only. Please read the disclaimer. ©1996-2008, all rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission of MediSpecialty.com |