![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Re: Ability to conceive at 36 without clomidFrom: Kelly Shanahan, MD (anonymous@obgyn.net)Tue, 14 Sep 1999 00:29:09 -0500 (CDT)
At Mon, 13 Sep 1999, Olivia wrote: > >I am 36 years old and have five children. I am wanting to conceive >again before my biological clock stops ticking. My baby is now 13 >months old and was breastfed until about 10 weeks ago. There was no >apparent cycling taking place while I was breastfeeding it was the same >when breastfeeding my other children. When my baby was weaned I began >taking my temperature daily and checking for mucus signs. My BBT went >up and there were mucus changes and fourteen days later I began to >bleed. It was a reasonably heavy bleed and lasted the normal 5-6 days. >I am now on day 24 and my temperature has stayed at around the 35.8 to >36.1. There has been no significant mucus changes. >There is low pelvic discomfort which is probably not significant but I >was found to have a fibroid during my last pregnancy. Because of >dysfunctional bleeding before that pregnancy I was placed on Provera >which zapped all my estrogen and was at a level of 15. I took clomid >for five days and conceived instantly. Do you think I should take >clomid now to achieve this pregnancy or am I just too impatient. Many >thanks. > >-- >Olivia > I vote for impatient -- you have only had one period since you stopped breastfeeding. Give you body a chance to do its thing. You sound as if your are very fertile and will probably conceive in no time.
-- Kelly Shanahan, MD, FACOG
|
| |
Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | internationale-mail | about us | advertising | our sponsors | contact us | disclaimer | This information is provided for educational purposes only. Please read the disclaimer. ©1996-2008, all rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission of MediSpecialty.com |