![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Re: prior c/s's and want VBACFrom: Kelly Shanahan, MD (anonymous@obgyn.net)Sun, 12 Sep 1999 14:18:31 -0500 (CDT)
At Sat, 11 Sep 1999, Bonnie wrote: > >Hello- >I am at a crossroads and need some advice. I have my complete medical >records so this is as accurate as I can be. > >History: first pregnancy induced at about 36 weeks for pre ecclampsia. >Pitocin introduced and internal monitor. I laid on my side the entire >labor and dialated to 5cm's. This occured in the time of 9 1/2 hrs. >Pelvic exam before induction showed no dialation. Putcome- c section 12 >hrs after labor induced.
snipped.....pregnancy- at 17 weeks I was told- by same OB- that I neede
a
>scheduled c/s- no reason given except that my only dialating 5 and then
snipped....>
>third pregnancy- I am now 24 weeks pregnant and much better prepared. I Only YOU can decide if the risk of uterine rupture is worth the POSSIBILTIY of delivering vaginally. The job of your doctors is to inform you of hte risks (about 1 -2% risk of uterine rupture which could possibly lead to death of the baby -- and you) and the benefits (less pain, less bleeding, faster recovery) of a successful VBAC. And remeber VBAC is not succesful 100% of the time -- across the board, teh success rate is about 70%, with wide variation depending on the reasons ofr the first c-section (very high suces if prior cection was for fetal distress or breech, for example, and abysmally low if prior cection was done because you pushed, and pushed and pushed and the baby wouldn't come out)
> If you really have a contracted pelvis, you may not be able to deliver vaginally. Ask your doctor about CT or Xray pelvimetry to measure the pelvic outlet.
> Getting stuck at 5 does not mean you can't deliver vaginally.
> Getting another opinion will not hurt anyone.A second doc may agree with the first.
>I do love this doctor- and feel he is only doing what he thinks is best- You have reason to sit down and talk to your doc about how much you want to TRY to deliver vagianlly. Your doc has to explain the risks and benefits to you. If you and your doctor cannot come to an agreement, then you may want to seek care elsewhere. ALso, your doctor has the right as well to refer you elsewhere if he is not comfortable taking care of you if you insist on a trial of labor. The bottom line is this is your body and your pregnancy. Of course you do not want to do anything ot harm your baby, but a carefully supervised trial of labor, assuming you have been counseled about the potential risks, is within your rights. You may decide after all the discusions that you want to go ahead and have a repeat section. That is within your rights as well. It is all aobut informed consent and choice.
-- Kelly Shanahan, MD, FACOG
|
| |
Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | internationale-mail | about us | advertising | our sponsors | contact us | disclaimer | This information is provided for educational purposes only. Please read the disclaimer. ©1996-2008, all rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission of MediSpecialty.com |