![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Re: Conservative Management - professional opinions neededFrom: William D. McIntosh, MD (anonymous@obgyn.net)Tue, 31 Aug 1999 14:05:50 -0500 (CDT)
At Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Sherene wrote: > >Hi! > >I'm hoping I can get an informed opinion here. My regular OB is away at >a conference for my last 2 weeks of pregnancy. Last week I saw another >OB in the practice for my 38 wk check and was informed that >"conservative management" of my condition would be to induce at date and >to have an NST per week until then. > >My condition, you ask? Well, they have me down as "mild chronic >hypertensive". I believe this is because they took several readings at >early appointments of 130/80. I have been taking my own at home with an >automatic cuff for most of the pregnancy and until 2-3 weeks ago, most >of my pressures were under 125/72. Over the last couple of weeks my >diastolic seems to possibly be on the rise (I've taken a few readings as >high as 76-78 but my systolic pressure is down, haven't taken one over >122 - mostly 112-118. Nevertheless, this OB did not know that, in fact, >he expressed surprise that I was even taking my own readings. > >I consented to the NST and had a reactive one Friday, will have another >Tues (tommorrow). I really do not wish to be induced, there is no >"mythology" of difficult birth in my family. This is my first however, >and I am not sure quite how to handle disagreement with a doctor. > >I'd be please to hear what the OBGYN college says about this and any of >your professional opinions. > >Gratefully, > >-- >Sherene edd 9/6 w/#1 > >P.S. There was some concern about a large baby with u/s at 31.3 wks >showing a 4lb 15oz baby but at 37 wks "only" 6lb 10oz. Family history >includes several large babies. > High blood pressure in pregnancy, whether pregnancy induced or chronic, is extremely serious, and your doctor is simply responding to that reality. Judging from the values that you have given, your BP is elevated somewhat over what would be expected at this point in pregnancy, and whether or not that is a harbinger of bad things to come is unclear. This is the rationale behind induction being the conservative management. What is the difference between conservative management and aggressive management? Well, that depends. Conservative management is that management that interferes the least amount that is consistent with safety. Sometimes, conservative management can be pretty aggressive, depending on the nature of the risk. I cannot comment on your personal risk, simply because I cannot examine you and review your record, but there is virtually no benefit to be derived from going beyond your due date (assuming good dates, early U/S and so on). Given that there is no benefit to be derived, and that you are showing evidence of hypertension, the better part of valor may well be induced delivery. At the very least, frequent antenatal testing in the form of NSTs and AFIs is essential. Always, always remember that the goal of pregnancy is a healthy mother and a healthy child. That comes before any other consideration.
-- William D. McIntosh, MD, FACOG Clarksville, TN
|
| |
Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | internationale-mail | about us | advertising | our sponsors | contact us | disclaimer | This information is provided for educational purposes only. Please read the disclaimer. ©1996-2008, all rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission of MediSpecialty.com |