Re: Pregnant, but..HCG did not double..is the baby dead?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: anonymous@obgyn.net: "Re: Water Birth vs. Epidural"
• Previous message: JoAnn: "Re: Stillbirth"
• In reply to: Alka: "Re: Pregnant, but..HCG did not double"
• Next in thread: D. Ashley Hill, M.D.: "Re: Pregnant, but..HCG did not double..is the baby dead?"
• Reply: D. Ashley Hill, M.D.: "Re: Pregnant, but..HCG did not double..is the baby dead?"
• Reply: Doris: "Re: Pregnant, but..HCG did not double..is the baby dead?"

At Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Alka wrote: >
>Hi,
>
>The HCG level increased from 4600(Thur) to 6428(Sat). I was told it is
>supposed to double in 48 hours.
>
>At Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Alka wrote: >
>>Hi,
>>
>>My LMP was july 3, so I am about 6.5 weeks pregnant. however, on
>>ultrasound there is no yolk sac, and the gestational sac is only 6 mm.
>>My HCG level is 4600. I am scared this might be a blighted ovum. help!

• Next message: anonymous@obgyn.net: "Re: Water Birth vs. Epidural"
• Previous message: JoAnn: "Re: Stillbirth"
• In reply to: Alka: "Re: Pregnant, but..HCG did not double"
• Next in thread: D. Ashley Hill, M.D.: "Re: Pregnant, but..HCG did not double..is the baby dead?"
• Reply: D. Ashley Hill, M.D.: "Re: Pregnant, but..HCG did not double..is the baby dead?"
• Reply: Doris: "Re: Pregnant, but..HCG did not double..is the baby dead?"