Re: luteal phase

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Valerie: "Re: drug testing part of prenatal care?"
• Previous message: Kelly Shanahan, MD: "Re: luteal phase"
• In reply to: Kelly Shanahan, MD: "Re: luteal phase"

At Fri, 30 Apr 1999, Kelly Shanahan, MD wrote: >
>At Fri, 30 Apr 1999, lisa wrote:
>>
>>Trying to get pregnant for 6 cycles - 35 y/o. My luteal phase is
>>consistently 9-10 days, and total cycle length usually 24-26 days
>>(though sometimes randomly 30 or 31). Could this luteal phase length
>>signal a hormone/fertility problem? Thanks.
>>
>>--
>>LA
>>
>Your luteal phase is a little short and may indicate lack of ovulation.
>Do either basal body temps or (even better) ovulation predictor kits. If
>you are ovulating, you may have a progesterone deficieny which may need
>correction in order for you to carry a pregnancy
>
>--
>M. Kelly Shanahan, MD, FACOG
>S. Lake Tahoe, CA
>
>Replies are for educational purposes only and do not construe any doctor-patient relationship; they do not take the place of a face-to-face consultation with your own doctor.
>Sorry, but personal e-mails will not be answered, due to time constraits and the desire to spend as much free time as possible with my husband and baby daughter
>

• Next message: Valerie: "Re: drug testing part of prenatal care?"
• Previous message: Kelly Shanahan, MD: "Re: luteal phase"
• In reply to: Kelly Shanahan, MD: "Re: luteal phase"