![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Re: Internal Fetal MonitoringFrom: Debbie (anonymous@obgyn.net)Wed, 28 Apr 1999 09:29:15 -0700
>> HI, I am 31wks. pregnant and am going to be induced at 38wks. and the >> doctor has decided that he wants to do internal fetal monitoring so that >> I am able to move and walk around during the first stage of labor. What >> I want to know is if this process is painful for the baby and what does >> it feel if anything? >>Veronica,> >Why are you being induced? >>Why does your doctor want to do internal monitoring? Internal monitoring is >done with an electrode placed in your baby's scalp. This means your water >will be broken, the electrode screwed into your baby's scalp (not far, just >into the skin), the cord will be attached to your thigh and you will be in >bed. Veronica, Is there more to this story? Does the reason for induction have more to do with why the MD wants to monitor internally perhaps? At our hospital (I'm an L&D nurse), internal monitoring does not mean you must stay in bed. There's no reason you cannot walk around with internal monitoring - it's usually the REASON that internal monitoring was done that prevents ambulation, not the monitoring itself (at least at our hospital - maybe others have different policies). There are also two types of internal monitoring - one for the baby's heartbeat and one for the uterine activity - either or both may be done internally. The heartrate might be monitored internally on a baby with a worrisome tracing (to get a very accurate look at how baby is doing), or on a mom who had alot of "padding" on her abdomen, making accurate external monitoring difficult or impossible. The internal uterine monitoring might be done if medication was needed to strengthen labor (more accurate record of strength/frequency of contractions). There are other reasons but those are the most common. As for telemetry monitoring: it's not the telemetry itself that can cause problems with an innacurate tracing, it's the upright position of mom. Because of the angle of the belly when standing and walking, it can be difficult to "point" the external transducer at the baby's heart. If the monitor does not get a strong signal, the tracing it shows will be spotty and difficult to evaluate. In my opinion, intermittent monitoring is a better answer - mom can walk or assume any position during monitor breaks. If baby's or mom's problems warrant continuous monitoring, then external tele while ambulating is probably not a good choice - in that instance an internal monitor (with tele) might be the answer - and now we're back to where we began! Debbie RNC
|
| |
Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | internationale-mail | about us | advertising | our sponsors | contact us | disclaimer | This information is provided for educational purposes only. Please read the disclaimer. ©1996-2008, all rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission of MediSpecialty.com |