![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Re: mid-life pregnancyFrom: anneminke (anonymous@obgyn.net)Mon, 19 Apr 1999 12:07:51 -0500 (CDT)
Dear Julie, I would say: go for it! I am 44 years old myself and pregnant with my first. I had a very easy pregnancy (allthough GETTING pregnant was a little problematic, but in the end we concieved naturally). I haven't been nauseous, my bloodpressure hasn't been over 110/60 during the entire pregnancy (I'm 39 weeks now), no diabetes. The only thing that sometimes bothers me is heartburn and, lately, fatigue. But those are minor problems. A friend of ours said that I have a natural talent for being pregnant. And she is right: I feel wonderfull, and look my best! As this is considered a high-risk pregnancy I have had all my check-ups in the hospital and will also give birth in the hospital (in my country, the Netherlands, most women prefer to (and actually) deliver at home). At 14 weeks I had an amnio, and since we got the results back at 17 weeks, we have been able to enjoy this pregnancy a 1000%! Our little girl has decided to stay in breechposition with one foot up and one down for over 10 weeks now, so my ObGyn thought it would be best to have a Ceasarian as this is a first child. A disappointment, I would have loved to give birth naturally. But the main thing is to have a healthy daughter! Ofcourse every pregnancy is different, as is every woman, but if you already had four good pregnancies, I would assume that this time would be no different! Good luck! Anneminke (now due April 21st)
At Sun, 18 Apr 1999, Kelly Shanahan, MD wrote:
>
|
| |
Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | internationale-mail | about us | advertising | our sponsors | contact us | disclaimer | This information is provided for educational purposes only. Please read the disclaimer. ©1996-2008, all rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission of MediSpecialty.com |