|
Re: Decended Testicles?
From: Adam (anonymous@obgyn.net)
Mon, 12 Apr 1999 07:46:13 -0500 (CDT)
Yes, this is a view looking up from the rear. It is almost a
cross-section shot of sorts as if you were looking into the scrtum.
At Mon, 12 Apr 1999, Cindy wrote:
>
>Disregard my post. :) I looked at mine again and the penis is smaller than
>what I am seeing on yours. Is yours taken from the rear and looking up?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: anonymous@obgyn.net [mailto:anonymous@obgyn.net On Behalf
>Of Cindy McCoy
>Sent: Monday, April 12, 1999 8:28 AM
>To: Multiple recipients of list PREGNANCY-BIRTH
>Subject: Re: Decended Testicles?
>
>That looks the same as all my ultrasound pictures, although I am told that
>is the penis and not the testes. The testes were much larger and rounder.
>
>I'm curious to see what others say.
>
>Cindy
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: anonymous@obgyn.net [mailto:anonymous@obgyn.net On Behalf
>Of Adam Burrell
>Sent: Monday, April 12, 1999 7:50 AM
>To: Multiple recipients of list PREGNANCY-BIRTH
>Subject: Decended Testicles?
>
>When are the testes supposed to decend in a male fetus? Is 27 weeks too
>early for them to have decended? We had an ultrasound at 27 weeks and in
>the picture of the male genitalia there appears to be 2 decended
>testicles. I am wondering if this is really what I'm seeing or is it
>too early for that. The picture is at
>http://homepages.go.com/~cliffjumper/camden3.html
|
|