![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Re: ConfusedFrom: D. Ashley Hill, M.D. (anonymous@obgyn.net)Wed, 7 Apr 1999 17:07:15 -0500 (CDT)
At Wed, 7 Apr 1999, Karen wrote: > >The situation: The child was born May 27, 1995, labor induced supposedly >due to being over due. The due date was May 25, 1995. The baby weighed >over 8lbs. The mother says the baby was born early. The over due came >from the hospital. If the mother did not have any sexual contact with >the supposed father until after Sept. 5, 1995, what would the >conception date have to be? Unfortunately, none of the above information will help determine the conception date. It is possible to have a due date of around May 25th if there was sexual contact around or shortly after September 5th. In order to get a closer "match," one would need to know when the pregnancy test was positive, and what an early ultrasound showed. Even then, it would probably not answer the question. However, there are paternity tests available that check the baby's blood type and genetic information.
-- Ashley Hill David Ashley Hill, M.D. Associate Director Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Florida Hospital Family Practice Residency Orlando, FL http://home.mpinet.net/dahmd
|
| |
Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | internationale-mail | about us | advertising | our sponsors | contact us | disclaimer | This information is provided for educational purposes only. Please read the disclaimer. ©1996-2008, all rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission of MediSpecialty.com |