PREGNANCY-BIRTH Messages for March, 1999: labor augmentation

search:

labor augmentation

From: reb (anonymous@obgyn.net)
Fri, 26 Mar 1999 15:49:16 -0600 (CST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: KH: "Re: sun tanning durring pregnancy"
Previous message: mary: "Re: sun tanning durring pregnancy"
Next in thread: William D. McIntosh, MD: "Re: labor augmentation"
Reply: William D. McIntosh, MD: "Re: labor augmentation"

In recent conversation, our dr's partner said that she would not allow me to go beyond 2 - 2 1/2 hrs with failure to progress in labor at 5 cm or greater... that it posed a risk to uterus to stay in that state for too long and could require hysterectomy. As we are trying for natural childbirth, I was disappointed to hear her approach. It feels rather arbitrary... and perhaps very conservative, to help Dr. avoid potential litigation. Are there any articles which support or oppose her position?

Next message: KH: "Re: sun tanning durring pregnancy"
Previous message: mary: "Re: sun tanning durring pregnancy"
Next in thread: William D. McIntosh, MD: "Re: labor augmentation"
Reply: William D. McIntosh, MD: "Re: labor augmentation"

recommended search...

OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

use when must restrict search to only the pregnancy & birth forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Jun 18 14:25:23 2009

Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote