![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Re: Automatic C/S for babies > 9 lbs?From: William D. McIntosh, MD (anonymous@obgyn.net)Mon, 8 Mar 1999 19:40:52 -0600 (CST)
At Mon, 8 Mar 1999, AMD wrote: > >My sister-in-law is just about to have a c-section after > 10 hours >pitocin with < 4 cm dilation. She is miserable and the epidural is not >providing enought relief. Last Monday, an U/S EFW was 8#12oz. When >explaining the need for the c/s with my husband and their mother, the >doctor mentioned a policy requiring c-sections for babies over 9 lbs. Is >it common to have this kind of cutoff for allowing a vaginal delivery? >I've known lots of 9# vaginal babies. > >BTW - she was induced for high blood pressure, combined with sheer >misery. Poor thing is so swollen all over that her skin can't stretch >anymore. > >Andrea This is a theory that has been proposed to try and reduce the incidence of a potentially bad birth problem called shoulder dystocia. The problem is that several studies have shown that there is no improvement in this problem by sectioning everyone at a specific fetal weight. Therefore, it is not the standard of care as defined by ACOG to perform an elective C/S for a specific fetal weight.
-- William D. McIntosh, MD Clarksville, TN
|
| |
Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | internationale-mail | about us | advertising | our sponsors | contact us | disclaimer | This information is provided for educational purposes only. Please read the disclaimer. ©1996-2008, all rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission of MediSpecialty.com |