![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Re: having a tubal after deliveryFrom: William D. McIntosh, MD (anonymous@obgyn.net)Fri, 26 Feb 1999 19:15:40 -0600 (CST)
At Thu, 25 Feb 1999, AMD wrote: > >Dr. McIntosh, > >Thank you for your candid answer, and I certainly hope it does not bring >an onslaught of hate-mail. I was very interested in your comment about >BCP's. As a teenager, I had horrible periods with cramps, vomiting, and >diarrhea, and a lot of bleeding. The pill was a godsend for these >problems. I don't know if I would still have these problems now that I >am older and had a couple of children. The only time I have not been on >the pill since I was 17 was when I was pregnant and the couple of months >before I got pregnant. It sounds like it might be wise to find out what >my normal period would be like without the pill before deciding to have >a tubal. If I'm going to need BCP's to keep my periods manageable, then >it would be foolish to have a tubal. > >Is an IUD a good option after childbirth? > >Thanks, >Andrea I think that trying your own natural cycle for a while, just to see how it fits, is a great idea. I am a big fan of the IUD in the properly selected patient. My wife (also an OB/GYN) and I used that between our children. You sound like the IUD poster child, a multiparous woman in a mutually monogamous relationship that wants long lasting effective contraception without hormones, but who is uncertain about sterilization. It can last 10 years, or simply as a bridge to BTL or vasectomy. Talk with your doctor. It is not for everyone.
-- William D. McIntosh, MD Clarksville, TN
|
| |
Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | internationale-mail | about us | advertising | our sponsors | contact us | disclaimer | This information is provided for educational purposes only. Please read the disclaimer. ©1996-2008, all rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission of MediSpecialty.com |