search:

Re: having a tubal after delivery

From: William D. McIntosh, MD (anonymous@obgyn.net)
Wed, 24 Feb 1999 16:34:53 -0600 (CST)


At Wed, 24 Feb 1999, AMD wrote: >
>My husband is trying to talk me into having my tubes tied after this
>baby is born. First of all, I'm not sure that I'm ready to do this, so
>at this point I would not consent. But my husband's thinking is that
>especially if I end up having a c-section, why not do both at once? (No
>flames about the hubby, please. He's just more sure than I am that he
>doesn't want to have any more kids.)
>
>But I would like to find out if there is any benefit or detriment to
>doing this immediately after delivery? Does it make a difference if the
>delivery is vaginal or c-section? If I was going to do this within the
>next year, would I be better off to do it at delivery or wait 6 months?
>
>Also, are there any studies supporting or refuting the claims that some
>women make that they have permanent gyn problems after a tubal?
>
>Andrea

I would suggest that the most important concern is how much you want to lock that door shut. This should be considered a permanent proceedure, so under no circumstances should you undergo a tubal until you are 100% sure that this is what you want. You can always do it later. If he is so sure, he can have a vasectomy.

You will notice that the physicians on this list avoid responding to those posts that purport to expose the horrors of the tubal ligation. This is not because we are all part of a gigantic conspiracy to torture women. It is because this is an issue that arouses religious-like fervor, and we have better things to do than to be the target of the inevitable river of flame mail. However, I will do it just this once.

There is no credible evidence that women who have had a tubal ligation suffer from more gynecologic problems, including pain, than women whose husbands have vasectomies. Millions of American women have undergone this safe and effective proceedure. The vast majority have no problems.

The recurrent theme to the post-Tubal-Ligation Syndrome is that the blood supply to the ovary is destroyed by the tubal. This is absurd. The ovary gets blood primarily from the ovarian artery, and secondarily from the uterus by way of the ovarian ligament. After the blood passes through or around the ovary, it then travels to the Fallopian tube. In other words, the tube is downstream from the ovary. So saying the the ovary's blood supply is compromised by a tubal is like saying that St. Louis won't get enough water in the Mississippi River if someone builds a dam at New Orleans. It just doesn't wash.

There is one other thing to remember. In modern America, many women reach the point of considering tubal ligation after having been either pregnant or on the Pill for the entirety of their reproductive lives, or close to it. Once you have a tubal, you don't take the Pill anymore, which means that you get the cycle that God gave you, not the cycle that the Pill gives you. That's OK if your cycle is regualar, light, and painless, but if you have the cycles from Hell when you are not on the Pill, then that is what you will have after a tubal ligation. That is not the fault of the tubal.

Make a descision that suits you for life, because that's how long you are going to have to live with it.

--
William D. McIntosh, MD
Clarksville, TN

This is for educational purposes only. It is not intended to replace consultation and examination by your physician or other health care provider.




recommended search...
Google
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

use when must restrict search to only the pregnancy & birth forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:
Return to [ Pregnancy & Birth Forum ] Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Jun 18 14:25:18 2009

Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote

home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | international
e-mail | about us | advertising | our sponsors | contact us | disclaimer |

This information is provided for educational purposes only.
Please read the disclaimer. ©1996-2008, all rights reserved.
Do not reproduce without permission of MediSpecialty.com