![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Re: Baby's Size - 7.5 lbs not Kilos!From: Thomas (anonymous@obgyn.net)Tue, 15 Sep 1998 23:09:09 -0500 (CDT)
At Tue, 15 Sep 1998, Thomas wrote: > >It's only about now that fetal sizes differ large enough to form an >opinion by feeling the uterus. However, with a growth retarded baby it >is possible to pick it up earlier. Feeling a woman's abdomen and >measuring the fundal height is a good screening test but the best way to >know what the size of a baby is by ultrasound scan. > >There is an association between parental and offspring birthweight >however it is possible for a small woman to have a large baby and a >large woman to have a small baby. > >Let me bore you with a story. > >In the 1970s a young doctor who is now an eminent professor did a small >study. He asked midwives and doctors to feel pregnant womens' abdomens >and guess the birth weight. The results were not surprising. The >experienced midwives and senior doctors gave the most accurate guess. >Then the less experienced midwives and junior doctors. Finally the >medical students and student midwives were the least accurate. There >were about to publish the data until one (above average intelligence) >medical student pointed out the error with the study. If the >researchers had got a monkey to make a guess and that monkeys had >guessed 7.5 lbs for each woman. Then the monkey would have been the most >accurate. > >-- >Dr Thomas Ind MB BS MD MRCOG >St George Hospital >Kogarah >Sydney >NSW 2217 >AUSTRALIA >
-- Dr Thomas Ind MB BS MD MRCOG St George Hospital Kogarah Sydney NSW 2217 AUSTRALIA
|
| |
Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | internationale-mail | about us | advertising | our sponsors | contact us | disclaimer | This information is provided for educational purposes only. Please read the disclaimer. ©1996-2008, all rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission of MediSpecialty.com |