PREGNANCY-BIRTH Messages for July, 2003: Dr.'s (or patients) Is 36 or 37 weeks considered full term???

search:

Dr.'s (or patients) Is 36 or 37 weeks considered full term???

From: Abby (anonymous@obgyn.net)
Thu, 10 Jul 2003 09:24:04 -0500 (CDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Amanda: "Re: Pregnancy after Vasectomy"
Previous message: anonymous: "RU-486"
Next in thread: anonymous@obgyn.net: "Re: Dr.'s (or patients) Is 36 or 37 weeks considered full term???"
Reply: anonymous@obgyn.net: "Re: Dr.'s (or patients) Is 36 or 37 weeks considered full term???"
Maybe reply: anonymous@obgyn.net: "Re: Dr.'s (or patients) Is 36 or 37 weeks considered full term???"

Many dr.'s around here consider 36 weeks full term, but I've always heard that 37 is the norm for full term. Chances are good that I'll be delivering early with my baby, when is the gestational age that a baby has a good chance of coming home with mom from the hospital? Is 34/35 weeks reasonable to expect a healthy baby with no complications or should I prepare for leaving my baby at this gest. age at the hospital?

Thanks for any input!!!

Next message: Amanda: "Re: Pregnancy after Vasectomy"
Previous message: anonymous: "RU-486"
Next in thread: anonymous@obgyn.net: "Re: Dr.'s (or patients) Is 36 or 37 weeks considered full term???"
Reply: anonymous@obgyn.net: "Re: Dr.'s (or patients) Is 36 or 37 weeks considered full term???"
Maybe reply: anonymous@obgyn.net: "Re: Dr.'s (or patients) Is 36 or 37 weeks considered full term???"

recommended search...

OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

use when must restrict search to only the pregnancy & birth forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Jun 18 14:21:32 2009

Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote